Archive for April, 2007

Richard Florida
by Richard Florida
Tue Apr 17th 2007 at 3:44pm UTC

Creativity and Religion

Tuesday, April 17th, 2007

I’m often asked about the connection between my creativity theories and religion. Usually, people are talking about the negative effects of organized religion, and in particular the religious right, on tolerance and creativity.

So I was ecstatic to meet Rod Garvin who was one of the 30 community catalysts in our Knight Initiative in Charlotte, and even more ecstatic to find this thoughtful post on Rod’s blog.

“As a Christian and a creative person by
nature, Florida’s theories resonate with me on many levels….Florida emphatically stresses that everyone is creative, but we
need an economy which allows all people to utilize that God given
talent, especially those in the service and manufacturing sectors, so
that they can contribute more ideas, and hopefully improve their
compensation as well.  The kind of conversations I am having as a
part of this initiative should be happening in the church, and a few
congregations are having this dialog. But, are Christians as a whole
ready to tackle some tough and uncomfortable questions? What happens
when society becomes more accepting of gays and lesbians than the
church? Racism and ethnic separation is a global problem, but churches
are far more segregated than most corporations and many neighborhoods.
Poverty and low wages are driven by economic structures and policies,
though personal choices can play a role. Do we have the courage to ask
if our capitalist economy can be made better and turn scarcity into
abundance? How do these issues affect our ability to bear
witness to the Good News of God’s Kingdom? How can Christians become
the creative Revolutionaries we are called to be?”

Rod and I talked for quite some time about this.  It’s clear that creative types are moving away from organized religion to less hierarchical and more organic forms of spirituality and spiritual expression.   And for reasons similar to other large-scale organizations, organized religions are having great trouble responding in a forward looking way.

Your thoughts?

Richard Florida
by Richard Florida
Tue Apr 17th 2007 at 3:36pm UTC

Flight Perspective

Tuesday, April 17th, 2007

Bernard Leong, a research scientist at the Genome Institute of Singapore and adjunct professor at the National University of Singapore Entrepreneurship Centre, provides an interesting review and perspective on Flight.

So, you look at the US, where most of the innovation are done there,
but most Americans are quite ridiculously weak in their undergraduate
work. …  why are they still at the pinnacle of research and
innovation? The answer is really simple, the foreign talent who come to
the US to do their postgraduate studies. By spending more money
and effort to create a strong postgraduate system, they take in the
best students from Asia  … By absorbing the best of the talent from Asian countries and
enticing them with benefits and atmosphere for innovation… the Asian countries manufacturing the educated class and letting the US and Europe to absorb them to their system and retain them.”

it may take awhile to sink in, but gradually more and more people are starting to realize this, and more and more countries and regions are taking steps to retain their own, attract expats back, and attract global talent.  The city-system has gone global, talent is mobile, so there is little reason to expect the US can have a permanent lock on the global talent game.

Richard Florida
by Richard Florida
Tue Apr 17th 2007 at 3:10pm UTC

Creative Class Consumption: Tourism & Travel

Tuesday, April 17th, 2007

Springwise is featuring a story on a new business that has creative class consumer (and producer) all over it. Chicago-based AudioSnacks is offering city/place tours via podcast — not too new, but still a growth market.

AudioSnacks ratchets it up a notch, by letting people upload and sell their tours. This means locals can create their own tours — perhaps giving visitors a very unique (authentic?) tour of a city or place or attraction. There already appears to be a broad range of providers (from Downtown Associations to individual tour guides), prices range from free to $16.00 (though I didn’t look at all of the tours).

This product is targeting mobile, curious members of the creative class; those who like to experience new things on their own terms and efficiently — no standing around waiting for the laggards in the group; no bulky device to rent from a museum; the ability to quickly skip ahead or pause or end the tour at a moments notice.

Here is the place to start searching their tours.

posted by David

Richard Florida
by Richard Florida
Sat Apr 14th 2007 at 3:46pm UTC

By the Numbers: Population Losses – Who was hit the hardest?

Saturday, April 14th, 2007

Last week the U.S. Census released new population estimates.  We covered the winners fairly extensively last week on the blog.  This week, we turn to those regions that were hit the hardest – which regions lost the greatest number of residents?   Just like last week’s "By the Numbers," we’ll show comparisons for large, medium, mid-sized, and small metros.

New Orleans, LA experienced the most dramatic loss in population, which is not surprising given the effect of Hurricane Katrina.  But, what’s going on in metros like Pittsburgh and Cleveland?  Why are these metros losing population so fast?  What are these region’s doing to “plug the hole?”

Click below to download the entire "By the Numbers" for this week.

Download PopulationLosses.pdf

posted by: steven

Richard Florida
by Richard Florida
Sat Apr 14th 2007 at 9:54am UTC

Netflix: Unlimited Rentals and Vacations

Saturday, April 14th, 2007

Vacation Policy at Netflix: Take As Much as You Like  teases the headline in the San Jose Mercury News. The piece by Ryan Blitstein (hat tip: Mark Exler) gets into the details of Netflix’s unlimited vacation policy. According to Netflix CEO Reed Hastings vacation limits and face-time requirements are "a relic of the industrial age." 

This article raises and explores many of the talent attraction/retention issues that companies and organizations are facing today.

From the piece,

(more…)

Richard Florida
by Richard Florida
Thu Apr 12th 2007 at 7:07pm UTC

Diversity Marches On

Thursday, April 12th, 2007

The AP reports on the rapid rise in interracial marriages:

“The charisma king of the 2008 presidential field. The world’s best golfer. The captain of the New York Yankees. Besides superstardom, Barack Obama, Tiger Woods and Derek Jeter have another common bond: Each is the child of an interracial marriage. For most of U.S. history, in most communities, … Factoring in all racial combinations, Stanford
University sociologist Michael Rosenfeld calculates that more than 7
percent of America’s 59 million married couples in 2005 were
interracial, compared to less than 2 percent in 1970. Coupled
with a steady flow of immigrants from all parts of the world, the surge
of interracial marriages and multiracial children is producing a 21st
century America more diverse than ever, with the potential to become
less stratified by race.”

Read the whole story here (hat tip: Kevin Stolarick)..

In one sense, William Julius Wilson was right: race and ethnicity are declining as a source of social cleavage, while class is increasing. A great irony of our time is that just as society appears more open to interracial marriage and toward racial and ethnic groups, race continues to play a fundamental role for what Wilson calls the “truly disadvantaged.”

Richard Florida
by Richard Florida
Thu Apr 12th 2007 at 1:42pm UTC

Road to Unhappiness

Thursday, April 12th, 2007

NyerPeople regularly commute 3 hours to and from work. The longest commute in America is 7 hours each way. Extreme commuting is up, up, up. Why in god’s name do people do this to themselves, especially when we know it makes them unhappy?

Read this New Yorker article to find out.

Richard Florida
by Richard Florida
Thu Apr 12th 2007 at 1:34pm UTC

You Are What You Drive

Thursday, April 12th, 2007

Gay_cars
Fascinating story over at the NY Times on cars and sexual orientation.

“Cars are no more straight or gay than cellphones, office chairs or
weed whackers. But in recent years that truism has not stopped a
perception among some motorists that certain cars can, in the right
context, be statements about a driver’s sexual orientation.  But to some people, such stereotyping is homophobia, pure and
simple. A poll seeking to determine the most gay automobiles, conducted
by a South African Web site, was a topic of heated interest last
December on Gizmodo, the New York-based technology blog, where one
reader wrote: “Since when are cars gay or straight? We’re really
polling people’s prejudices here.” Others, though, including gay theorists, say many gay motorists happily embrace certain cars as reflections of identity.”

The full story is here (sub required).

I’m not sure if cars match sexual orientation, but what I do know is that people’s preferences in lots of things – from music and furniture to their choice of neighborhood and location reflects their underlying personality type.  The pyschologists Sam Gosling and Jason Renfrew show that musical taste reflects personality type and that people who ask about musical preferences may be actually finding those who match their underlying personality type. More likely than picking up gay or straight, what this might reflect are the purchasing patterns of more visible, trend setting people. It’s fairly clear to us that trend-setters, like creative and innovators generally, are high on openness to new experience. And thus such people, gay and straight, are more likely to buy new, less conventional, more “out there” stuff. Plus they’re also heavily concentrated or clustered in certain places and certain kinds of neighborhoods which magnifies their preferences and role as tastemakers.

Your thoughts?

“Ramone Johnson is a gay journalist and former
Saturn engineer who compiles an annual “Top 10 Gay Cars” list for
About.com, which is owned by The New York Times Company. Mr. Johnson
said that “traditionally we are used to being defined by others.”
Driving a stylish car can be a way of “taking control back” and saying
“this is who I am,” he said. Mr. Johnson maintains that “soft lines” and a “vibrant personality”
— say like those on a Volkswagen New Beetle — are typical attributes of
a gay man’s car, and fashion-forward red gauges and other styling cues,
for example, make the Pontiac G6 more of a gay car than its sibling,
the Grand Am, because the features express a taste for freedom and fun.  Neither automobile manufacturers nor dealers compile statistics on the sexual orientation of buyers.

Frank Markus, who is gay and the technical director for Motor Trend
magazine, said auto companies tend to associate gay consumers with
higher disposable incomes since fewer have children (one reason many
are free to opt for less practical cars, like two-seaters or
convertibles, as well). Tellingly, when the American Family
Association, a conservative Christian group, pressured the Ford Motor
Company to pull advertising from gay publications like The Advocate in
2005, the ads were for Land Rover and Jaguar, two high-end brands owned
by Ford. Subaru has been the most prominent company to embrace the gay
market. As long ago as 2000, the automaker created advertising
campaigns around Martina Navratilova,
the gay tennis star, and also used a sales slogan that was a subtle
gay-rights message: “It’s not a choice. It’s the way we’re built.”
Little wonder that many lesbians refer to their Outbacks as “Lesbarus.”

Even General Motors recently began to include questions about sexual
orientation on some internal market surveys, although data are not yet
compiled, said Adam Bernard, who tracks the product strategies of
G.M.’s competitors and who also coordinates an advocacy group for gay
employees at the company called GM Plus. Since 2003, he said, the group
has consulted with marketing executives at the company about increasing
sales to gay consumers. Lacking a precise portrait of its gay car buyers, the company still
has taken increasing strides to break into this market, Mr. Bernard
said, advertising its Cadillac, Saturn and Saab divisions in gay
publications and Web sites like PlanetOut.com.

Company executives, he said, do not seem to feel skittish about
losing market share among straight consumers if gay buyers suddenly
seize on a particular model. “I don’t think internally we ever asked
the question, ‘If we put Cadillac in The Advocate, are we going to lose
straight Cadillac buyers?’ ”“Frankly,” he added, “the money’s all the same color.” Mr. Markus of Motor Trend said clichés about gay drivers tend to
collapse on close inspection, like the gay man who is a “gym bunny” and
gravitates toward Jeeps and convertibles “to show off his hot body.”
But, he added, “If you could actually push a button and see what every
gay person drives, it’s probably not too different from what the
average person drives, but it might skew higher in price.”

On Gaywheels.com, one indicator of actual gay buying trends is the
list of vehicles most frequently researched. As of last October, the
Toyota Yaris, a $12,000 economy car, led that list, followed by the
Toyota Camry, which was the No. 3-selling car in America last year. It would be hard to find a more
conventional automobile.”

Richard Florida
by Richard Florida
Thu Apr 12th 2007 at 1:13pm UTC

Why Buy When You Can Lease

Thursday, April 12th, 2007

The Times‘ David Leonhart, one of my favorite economic columnist’s takes on the question of whether to buy or rent in the current housing slump.  His conclusion: rent, hands-down.

But in a stark reversal, it’s now clear that people who chose
renting over buying in the last two years made the right move. In much
of the country, including large parts of the Northeast, California, Florida
and the Southwest, recent home buyers have faced higher monthly costs
than renters and have lost money on their investment in the meantime.
It’s almost as if they have thrown money away, an insult once reserved
for renters. Most striking, perhaps, is the fact that prices may not yet have
fallen far enough for buying to look better than renting today, except
for people who plan to stay in a home for many years.  With the spring moving season under way, The New York Times has done
an analysis of buying vs. renting in every major metropolitan area. The
analysis includes data on housing costs and looks at different
possibilities for the path of home prices in coming years.”

The full story is here (sub required).

Other research finds that very high rates of home-ownership work againts econiomic performance. Clearly home-ownership was a key factor driving consumption in the industrial fordist age. But the creative economy requires much more flexibility and mobility. Does that home also pin you down?  Should be really be thinking of new models for housing tenure?

It found that even though rents have recently jumped, the costs that
come with buying a home — mortgage payments, property taxes, fees to
real estate agents — remain a lot higher than the costs of renting. So
buyers in many places are basically betting that home prices will rise
smartly in the near future.

Over the next five years, which is about the average amount of time
recent buyers have remained in their homes, prices in the Los Angeles
area would have to rise more than 5 percent a year for a typical buyer
there to do better than a renter. The same is true in Phoenix, Las
Vegas, the New York region, Northern California and South Florida. In
the Boston and Washington areas, the break-even point is about 4
percent.

“House prices have to fall more before housing becomes a clear buy again,” says Mark Zandi, chief economist of Moody’s Economy.com,
a research company that helped conduct the analysis. “These markets
aren’t as overvalued as they were a year ago or two years ago, but
they’re still unfriendly. And that’s one of the reasons the market is
still soft — people realize it’s not a bargain.”

Richard Florida
by Richard Florida
Wed Apr 11th 2007 at 1:01pm UTC

Oprah Does Place

Wednesday, April 11th, 2007

Here’s the tag line for today’s show: “Where you live, what you do, how much sex you have—we’re uncovering the real secrets to true happiness! “