<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Class, Politics, and Geography</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.creativeclass.com/_v3/creative_class/2008/11/04/class-politics-and-geography/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.creativeclass.com/_v3/creative_class/2008/11/04/class-politics-and-geography/</link>
	<description>The source on how we live, work and play</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 18:10:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Frank the Tank</title>
		<link>http://www.creativeclass.com/_v3/creative_class/2008/11/04/class-politics-and-geography/comment-page-1/#comment-7210</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank the Tank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 19:51:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.creativeclass.com/_v3/creative_class/?p=4552#comment-7210</guid>
		<description>This is a fascinating argument that turns around the common thinking that poor people have been voting on &quot;values&quot; against their economic interests - in fact, it appears to be the opposite where the affluent can &quot;afford&quot; to vote on their own &quot;values&quot;.  Of course, a lot of the data Gelman has pointed out is based on the 2004 election, where high-income business people still voted for and gave disproportionate campaign contributions to Republicans over Democrats.  In contrast, for all of the talk about Obama&#039;s small online donations, he has also dominated in getting contributions from Wall Street and other moneyed constituencies like no other Democrat in history.  It will be interesting if Gelman&#039;s argument based on 2004 will still hold true for today&#039;s election.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a fascinating argument that turns around the common thinking that poor people have been voting on &#8220;values&#8221; against their economic interests &#8211; in fact, it appears to be the opposite where the affluent can &#8220;afford&#8221; to vote on their own &#8220;values&#8221;.  Of course, a lot of the data Gelman has pointed out is based on the 2004 election, where high-income business people still voted for and gave disproportionate campaign contributions to Republicans over Democrats.  In contrast, for all of the talk about Obama&#8217;s small online donations, he has also dominated in getting contributions from Wall Street and other moneyed constituencies like no other Democrat in history.  It will be interesting if Gelman&#8217;s argument based on 2004 will still hold true for today&#8217;s election.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

