Richard Florida
by Richard Florida
Sat Feb 7th 2009 at 10:45am UTC

Our Economic Future Depends on the Creativity of All

We had one overarching goal in mind when we released our report on Ontario’s economic future this Thursday – to help catalyze a real conversation about the long-run future of the economy. We want put to rest any false distinction between a creative elite and the rest of the economy. We call on government, business, labor, education, mayors, economic developers, and all of us to develop new strategies and new models to harness the creative talents of each and every person, each and every organization, and each and every community. Roger Martin and I – and our entire team – could not be more pleased by the reaction.

The Star’s David Olive builds brilliantly on our call for tapping workers’ intelligence and transforming education.

The Globe and Mail calls for putting the creativity of every single person at the center of our economic strategy, and for making manufacturing more productive and effective by harnessing the full talents of workers.

Roger and I provide a summary of our ideas here.

And here’s our column today on the need to focus on and invest in the skills required to compete and prosper in the future.

Like all advanced economies, ours is in the midst of a great transformation – to an economy in which creativity, skills, and knowledge matter more than strength and muscle… At bottom, today’s challenge is the move from jobs oriented to routine to jobs that hinge on creativity. Routine-oriented workers carry out standardized tasks, often repetitively and in a preset sequence.

Traditionally, many of these jobs have been in manufacturing – Henry Ford’s assembly line is the classic example. But the greater portion of them now are in service occupations: waitresses following standard procedures in restaurants, or clerical staff and their paperwork.

Over the coming decade, they will account for about half of all jobs created in Canada and the U.S. alike. Yet we still undervalue creative jobs and the key skills on which they depend – consider the controversy over funding cuts for research and innovation in the recent federal budget.

The manufacturing economy honed physical skills such as lifting and manual dexterity. But two sets of creative skills matter more now – analytical skills such as pattern recognition and problem solving, as well as social-intelligence skills such as the situational sensitivity and persuasiveness that are required for team building and mobilization.

Fields that demand high analytical skills (such as medicine and bioengineering) and social intelligence (such as psychiatry and management) are not only growing faster than others, they also pay much more.

Moving from a job in the bottom quarter of analytical-skill levels to one in the top quarter – from travel agent to, say, accountant – means an additional $18,700 in pay; the gap between jobs that are low or high in social-intelligence skills is even greater, valued at $25,100. The reverse is true of physical skills: Moving between a job in the bottom quarter and one in the top quarter of physical demands would be accompanied by, on average, an $8,100 drop in wages… But it’s not enough just to expand the availability of Creative Age work. It’s critical that we increase the creative content – the analytical and social aspects – of all our jobs.

And that is a challenge that goes beyond government: Business needs to take on more sophisticated models that encourage their workers to use these kinds of skills, which generate the productivity needed to pay higher wages. The result is a virtuous circle of prosperity in which workers use more of their capabilities, and business gains and wages and living standards increase.

It is already happening in some places. While workers at some manufacturing operations remain stuck with mindless labor, others are engaged in quality circles and statistical training and have more individual authority on the line. Their companies benefit from improved productivity, while the workers benefit from more secure jobs and higher wages.

And it is happening in parts of the service economy as well, which is key – since routine-oriented service accounts for 46 percent of all jobs in Canada – to building shared prosperity for everyone. Four Seasons, for example, established itself as one of the world’s leading luxury-hotel chains in no small part thanks to its ability to increase the creativity content of hotel-staff jobs. By treating its employees with dignity and leveraging their talents, Four Seasons is able to offer the unparalleled service that has made it a global leader in its field.

If we want a high-wage economy, we also have to ensure that our training programs and schools develop social and analytical skills, and focus our efforts on attracting businesses that invest in the creativity of their workers.

To be successful, we must tap and harness our most important resource: the creative capabilities and talents of all…

The full report is here.

2 Responses to “Our Economic Future Depends on the Creativity of All”

  1. Elizabeth McDonald Says:

    Thanks for your great report! I posted links on my own blog From the voice of…discussing how the Canadian classical music community can continue to be part of this creative class.

    Personally I AM the creative class – opera singer living in Prince Edward County (the new creative rural economy)with my family teaching in Kingston and singing where ever I get hired. Thanks for articulating what many of us have done on insinct!

  2. Christy Brewer Says:

    I’ve been away from the Creative Class discussions for a while, so please pardon me if this sounds too neophyte…

    Have businesses figured out how to translate those extremely smart, thinking workers into value for their customers? Do customers know to clamor to these smart businesses specifically because its employees are smart, caring and will use their brains?

    How can we help companies realize strengths and communicate those to customers, increasing the value of the product, service, company, worker?