Michael Wells
by Michael Wells
Tue Apr 28th 2009 at 10:27am UTC

One Nation Under (Your Name Here?)

“Americans not losing their religion, but changing it often” is a headline on CNN.com. It reports on a new study by the Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life that says:

Americans change religious affiliation early and often. In total, about half of American adults have changed religious affiliation at least once during their lives. Most people who change their religion leave their childhood faith before age 24, and many of those who change religion do so more than once. These are among the key findings of a new survey conducted by the Pew Research Center’s Forum on Religion & Public Life. The survey documents the fluidity of religious affiliation in the U.S. and describes in detail the patterns and reasons for change.

The reasons people give for changing their religion – or leaving religion altogether – differ widely depending on the origin and destination of the convert. The group that has grown the most in recent years due to religious change is the unaffiliated population. But this group’s growth seems to have less to do with the belief that science disproves religion than with disenchantment with religious people and institutions. Many people who left a religion to become unaffiliated say they did so, in part, because they think of religious people as hypocritical or judgmental, because religious organizations focus too much on rules or because religious leaders are too focused on power and money. Far fewer say they became unaffiliated because they believe that modern science proves that religion is just superstition.

This follows on a recent Newsweek cover story titled “The End of Christian America” which begins:

The percentage of self-identified Christians has fallen 10 points in the past two decades. How that statistic explains who we are now and what, as a nation, we are about to become.

While there may have been been a 10-point drop, the end is still a ways away – 76 percent of Americans call themselves Christian. This is also from a Pew study, laid out on this website.

All of this reminds me of one of my favorite books of 2001, A New Religious America by Diane Eck. A Harvard religion professor, she discovered that one of the ways immigration is shaping America is by bringing in non-”Judeo-Christian” faiths: Muslim, Buddhist, Hindu and many others. How does “One Nation Under God” apply to non-theistic Buddhists  or multi-theistic Hindus? Her Pluralism Project’s website shows examples of new religions all over the U.S.

We’re in a time of fundamental change in many ways – financial, environmental, political are in the news. But behind the scenes, America, while still the world’s most religious developed country, is re-examining how all of this fits into the REALLY larger picture.

4 Responses to “One Nation Under (Your Name Here?)”

  1. Aaron Templer Says:

    Minor off-point point: While not at all an expert in Hinduism, precisely all of the Hindus I’ve come across in life do NOT consider themselves multi-theistic.

    Common Hindu expressions: Many paths to the same destination. Names there are many, God there is one.

    I’m sure there are other Hindus who’d like to help me better understand this and I’d welcome the opportunity to learn.

    As for the point of your post, the Hindus and the Buddhists that I have known in my life are the last people that worry about the mono-theistic prostlytizing that gives those of us pause who have come from Christian backgrounds and now question its dogma.

    As a Buddhist friend of mine once put it: Everyone’s a Buddhist. They just don’t know it yet.

    Again, I welcome the opportunity to understand more.

  2. Michael Wells Says:

    Aaron,

    Good points. Whether Hindus are multi-theistic is beyond me, it’s a complex and vibrant religion.

    I guess I was thinking more of the impact of Hindus, Buddhists, etc. on American society than the other way around. “One Nation Under God” implies a Judeo/Christian/Muslim type monotheism, or at least it used to. Now, God Knows. But He/She/They keeps the rest of us guessing.

    Just as the number of Asian, Latino and Africans as well as other immigrants affects American society with language and attitudes about race, the influx of Buddhists, Hindus, etc. is also having an impact. It’s just not in the news as much. One of the things Diane Eck noticed was that many of her colleagues at Harvard were studying the impact of immigrants on economics, language, culture, business, etc. but they had a blind spot about religion.

    The fact that you and I know Hindus and Buddhists is a change from 50 years ago when it would have been very unusual.

  3. Michael Wells Says:

    This list of religious freedom just showed up on CNN.com. Whatever is happening to religion in America, at least it’s free and going its many ways in peace.

    http://www.cnn.com/2009/US/05/01/religious.freedom/index.html

  4. Frank Says:

    I am surprised that people who believe in multiple gods do not consider themselves multi-theistic, regardless of how complex and vibrant the religion is alleged to be.

    Is it that “precisely all” of the Hindus you know deny the ‘godhood’ of Vishnu, Shiva, hanuman, Ganesh etc.?

    Is it reasonable for Christians not to consider themselves mono-theists? Why or why not? (I’m particulary intersted if the number of deities they believe in has any bearing)