<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Smoking and Obesity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.creativeclass.com/_v3/creative_class/2010/03/04/smoking-and-obesity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.creativeclass.com/_v3/creative_class/2010/03/04/smoking-and-obesity/</link>
	<description>The source on how we live, work and play</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 18:10:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Surgery Free Weight Loss</title>
		<link>http://www.creativeclass.com/_v3/creative_class/2010/03/04/smoking-and-obesity/comment-page-1/#comment-47601</link>
		<dc:creator>Surgery Free Weight Loss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 17:02:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.creativeclass.com/_v3/creative_class/?p=13940#comment-47601</guid>
		<description>How ya Doin? was just browsing your site and I enjoyed this post so I thought I would tell you with this comment. Thanks again. P.S I found your blog with the  Google Search Engine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How ya Doin? was just browsing your site and I enjoyed this post so I thought I would tell you with this comment. Thanks again. P.S I found your blog with the  Google Search Engine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jake</title>
		<link>http://www.creativeclass.com/_v3/creative_class/2010/03/04/smoking-and-obesity/comment-page-1/#comment-18319</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2010 03:57:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.creativeclass.com/_v3/creative_class/?p=13940#comment-18319</guid>
		<description>I didn&#039;t read the paper but i would have to assume fat people that smoke is just a bad combo. They get so overweight then dont exercise. Me being a smoker i know i don&#039;t exercise as much as i should due to being out of breath etc. At least i have quit before and know i can do it again. I don&#039;t know what I&#039;d do if i had to quit three things at ones... smoking, over eating, and not exercising.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t read the paper but i would have to assume fat people that smoke is just a bad combo. They get so overweight then dont exercise. Me being a smoker i know i don&#8217;t exercise as much as i should due to being out of breath etc. At least i have quit before and know i can do it again. I don&#8217;t know what I&#8217;d do if i had to quit three things at ones&#8230; smoking, over eating, and not exercising.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan</title>
		<link>http://www.creativeclass.com/_v3/creative_class/2010/03/04/smoking-and-obesity/comment-page-1/#comment-16869</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 18:56:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.creativeclass.com/_v3/creative_class/?p=13940#comment-16869</guid>
		<description>Knowing something doesn&#039;t mean you use that knowledge. I read the paper and the causality link is missing. High correlations are just that, correlations. Ice cream consumption and drowning are highly correlated for example.

There is a body of work looking at how knowledge impacts behavior - see Mel Hovell et al.&#039;s work at C-BEACH, in particular, the Behavioral Ecological Model.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Knowing something doesn&#8217;t mean you use that knowledge. I read the paper and the causality link is missing. High correlations are just that, correlations. Ice cream consumption and drowning are highly correlated for example.</p>
<p>There is a body of work looking at how knowledge impacts behavior &#8211; see Mel Hovell et al.&#8217;s work at C-BEACH, in particular, the Behavioral Ecological Model.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Wells</title>
		<link>http://www.creativeclass.com/_v3/creative_class/2010/03/04/smoking-and-obesity/comment-page-1/#comment-16864</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Wells</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 01:25:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.creativeclass.com/_v3/creative_class/?p=13940#comment-16864</guid>
		<description>Back in the late 20&#039;s Lucky Strike promoted smoking to women as a weight loss tool &quot;Reach for a Lucky Instead of a Sweet&quot;. Women were a much smaller percentage of smokers in those days. (Google the motto to see some examples.) 

Nicotine is indeed an appitite surpressant and I read somewhere that increasing American obesity is somewhat related to lower smoking levels. Of course, the class-related health habits of smoking, unhealthy eating and overeating (Supersize that)overpowers the nicotine and we see a lot of fat smokers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Back in the late 20&#8217;s Lucky Strike promoted smoking to women as a weight loss tool &#8220;Reach for a Lucky Instead of a Sweet&#8221;. Women were a much smaller percentage of smokers in those days. (Google the motto to see some examples.) </p>
<p>Nicotine is indeed an appitite surpressant and I read somewhere that increasing American obesity is somewhat related to lower smoking levels. Of course, the class-related health habits of smoking, unhealthy eating and overeating (Supersize that)overpowers the nicotine and we see a lot of fat smokers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wendy</title>
		<link>http://www.creativeclass.com/_v3/creative_class/2010/03/04/smoking-and-obesity/comment-page-1/#comment-16781</link>
		<dc:creator>Wendy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 18:14:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.creativeclass.com/_v3/creative_class/?p=13940#comment-16781</guid>
		<description>Somewhere I&#039;ve read about a correlation between education levels and activity levels (amount of exercise one gets) as well as smoking propensity, so it makes sense that places with more &quot;post industrial&quot; economic activity, which often requires more education, have lower levels of obesity and smoking too. 

It also may be that after sitting at a desk for much of the day, there is an inclination to want to exercise.  Working on an assembly line is probably more inherently exhausting, making and the couch and TV remote more appealing after work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Somewhere I&#8217;ve read about a correlation between education levels and activity levels (amount of exercise one gets) as well as smoking propensity, so it makes sense that places with more &#8220;post industrial&#8221; economic activity, which often requires more education, have lower levels of obesity and smoking too. </p>
<p>It also may be that after sitting at a desk for much of the day, there is an inclination to want to exercise.  Working on an assembly line is probably more inherently exhausting, making and the couch and TV remote more appealing after work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.creativeclass.com/_v3/creative_class/2010/03/04/smoking-and-obesity/comment-page-1/#comment-16765</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 20:13:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.creativeclass.com/_v3/creative_class/?p=13940#comment-16765</guid>
		<description>As was pointed out in the Rise of the Creative Class, creative jobs are different than other types of jobs.  Dan Pink pointed out on the TED Talks that what really motivates people at work are Autonomy, Mastery, and Purpose.  Creative Class type jobs provide ample opportunities for all of those things, whereas people working in non-creative positions generally have much less autonomy, much less scope for mastery, and I would suspect feel that their jobs don&#039;t fulfill an important function, or at the very least bring so little in the way of social status that it is difficult to see them as important.  All of these things lead to a more stressful working environment, and stress is very bad for one&#039;s health.  I also wouldn&#039;t be surprised if people who felt like they had less autonomy at work were less likely to feel like they have control in other areas of their lives.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As was pointed out in the Rise of the Creative Class, creative jobs are different than other types of jobs.  Dan Pink pointed out on the TED Talks that what really motivates people at work are Autonomy, Mastery, and Purpose.  Creative Class type jobs provide ample opportunities for all of those things, whereas people working in non-creative positions generally have much less autonomy, much less scope for mastery, and I would suspect feel that their jobs don&#8217;t fulfill an important function, or at the very least bring so little in the way of social status that it is difficult to see them as important.  All of these things lead to a more stressful working environment, and stress is very bad for one&#8217;s health.  I also wouldn&#8217;t be surprised if people who felt like they had less autonomy at work were less likely to feel like they have control in other areas of their lives.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

