Richard Florida
by Richard Florida
Sat May 1st 2010 at 8:00am UTC

Canada and the Great Reset

My latest contribution to The Globe and Mail:

Canadians love to buy houses.

Not only does the rate of home ownership surpass that of the United States, Canada seems to have dodged the crisis that so vexes the U.S. Sales are up, and property values keep appreciating as U.S. prices have fallen 30 per cent or more.

As an investment, home ownership seems to match Canada’s national character: it’s responsible, practical and risk-averse.

Or at least it has been.

This week, financial analysts at Edward Jones rained on the real-estate parade warning that current conditions – prices that are too high, easy credit and lax government policy – could lead to a big downturn in the market.

Which may not be such a terrible thing because home ownership is an impediment to Canada’s long-term prosperity.

Historically, a house has been like a savings account that keeps on growing. Keep it 20 or 30 years, and you can finance your retirement.

And yet, except for some exceptional booms, housing has never been that good an investment. Yale University’s Robert Shiller, a keen student of economic bubbles, found that, in the U.S., from “1890 to 1990, the rate of return on residential real estate was just about zero after inflation.”

There are some important social benefits – home ownership generally instills in people a deeper commitment to their community. But it also can be very costly to the economy.

A study by the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas in 1998, well before the boom and bust, found the U.S. had over-invested in housing relative to other forms of capital since 1929. It has drained off capital from productivity improvement, innovation, medical technology, software or alternative energy: sectors that could drive growth well into the future.

Here as well, housing sucks up a huge share of national capital that should go to support innovation and new industries. Canadians actually carry more mortgage debt as a percentage of their disposable incomes than Americans do.

British economist Andrew Oswald has found that cities with higher rates of home ownership also have higher unemployment – in Europe, a 10-per-cent rise in the former corresponds with a 2-per-cent rise in the latter.

What’s the link? The simple fact that anyone who has invested in a house is less likely to pack up and leave when times get tough.

In 2008, fewer Americans moved, as a percentage of the population, than in any year since the U.S. Census Bureau started tracking changes of address in the late 1940s: less than 12 per cent versus more than 20 during suburbia’s golden years.

By the same token, laid-off workers who can’t sell a home in Windsor aren’t about to move to Toronto, Vancouver or Calgary where jobs are easier to find.

Yet this is the absolute worst time for people to lose the ability to move around. The economy is going through a broad structural shift. This is a moment of significant creative destruction; old industries are giving way to new ones. It’s much harder for workers to find jobs where they live.

But the U.S. has shown an uncanny ability to use crisis to remake its economy, and it has remade its housing system more than once, most recently ushering in the suburban age and mass home ownership after the Second World War.

It may be doing so again. Because of the economic crisis, fewer Americans are buying houses, a decline likely to continue as young people choose to save money and guard their options by renting. Sure, the social costs are considerable, but they can be more than offset by the broader gains to the economy provided by a more flexible, 21st-century housing system.

As a result, Americans may already be restoring the flexibility and mobility at the heart of their resilience, adaptability and innovativeness. Rahm Emmanuel, who is chief of staff to U.S. President Barack Obama, likes to say that “a crisis is a terrible thing to waste.” In the end, Canada may face a bigger challenge even if its bubble doesn’t burst: If times are good, why bother changing

5 Responses to “Canada and the Great Reset”

  1. Carlos Says:

    I wouldn’t want to buy some elses house at a fortune. It is like wearing somelses clothes
    or left over food. The cost of maintence is a problem.

  2. Andrew Webster Says:

    A challenge here might be related to motive. Right or wrong, people feel a sense of security when paying into a mortgage. Are people prepared to release this security for the greater good of national prosperity and innovation? Are they prepared to tolerate a government that would take it from them in favour of prosperity?

    I wonder what percent of voters in Canada are home owners? Perhaps governments could tighten up policy and only offend a generation of non-voting home owning wannabes.

  3. Gus Cristi Says:

    I think owning a home is no longer the dream of every person. Cash is king and the more you have the better off you will be. Renting is lower than paying taxes, upkeep and bills on a home. So even when you pay off your home you are still paying more to live.

    One can argue that the equity is a good investment, but equity is only good if your going to sell. After that you have the cash. Good way to make cash but you will pay in to get out.

    Glad to see Canada doing so well, but it really is just a trend and all goes up and comes back down. Canada seems to follow the US into a recession and lead the US out of it.

  4. Ted Says:

    Here in Australia we have a very high rate of home ownership. It’s been “The Great Australian Dream” since before WW11. Yes,, prices have been going to what many see as unrealistic levels in the last few years, yet we have very low unemployment rates (don’t tell that to someone out of work though!). High rates of home ownership do not always correlate to high unemployment levels. Thhere are many factors at work.

    Renting a property here can be almost the same as paying a mortgage – sometimes it’s cheaper to take out a mortgage on a simple home than pay rent. We have a shortage of rental properties, even though a “landlord” – anyone with a second property they wish to rent out as an investment enjoys huge tax advantages for doing so. Investors like this have been pushing property prices to stratoshperic levels – which is proving to be unhelpful to the economy, but there seems no way to convince any politician to wind back the tax incentives – they face elections!

  5. Rolanda Mencke Says:

    High risk mortgage lenders, commonly called sub-prime lenders, are lenders that specialize in offering loans to people with riskier credit numbers. Due to recent historically low rates, many borrowers are making the decision to purchase their first home or renew the financing of their present mortgage in order to obtain a better rate.