Richard Florida
by Richard Florida
Fri Apr 29th 2011 at 10:00am UTC

Show Me the Money: The Geography of Superstar Sports Millionaires

Boxer Manny Pacquiao and baseball star Alex Rodriguez top the list of the world’s highest paid athletes, according to new data compiled by ESPN.

ESPN tracked annual salaries—the base pay the players received for their most recent season or calendar year (endorsements and other sources of income were excluded) across 182 nations and 17 sports, from baseball and basketball to badminton and cricket. Salary data was collected from “multiple sources, including leagues, agents, consulates, embassies, sports federations, cultural centers and the U.N.”

Wake up America: It’s not football, baseball, basketball, or even NASCAR that accounts for the lion’s share of sports superstars: 114 of the 184 best-paid athletes in the world play soccer—almost seven times more than the next runner up (basketball, with 18 uber-rich players). For the rest, there are 12 baseball players, six auto-racers, five golfers, five football players, four cricketeers, three boxers, and three track and field contestants. Rugby and tennis each contribute two competitors and there is one representative each from badminton, cycling, motorcycle racing, sumo wrestling, and yachting.

The first map, above, by Zara Matheson of the Martin Prosperity Institute shows which countries these athletes live in. The richest two players, Pacman the Destroyer and A-Rod (both earned $32,000,000), live in the Philippines and the U.S. respectively (A-Rod spent much of his childhood in the Dominican Republic, but was born in New York City). Finland’s Kimi Raikonnen ($26.3 million) and Spain’s Fernando Alonso ($22.7 million), both auto racers, are the third and fourth highest paid. Venezuela’s Johan Santana clocks in at $21 million and some change; Italy’s Valentino Rossi, a motorcycle racer, earns $20,800,000.

The second map shows the ratio of the highest paid athletes’ salaries to a proxy measure for average pay – a country’s Gross Domestic Product or GDP per person. A-Rod’s $32 million salary, for example, is about 715 times the size of the per capita U.S. GDP of $44,872 per person.  Jason Bay, who hails from Canada, makes $18.1 million playing for the New York Mets – 455 times Canada’s per capita GDP. That sounds like – and is – a big difference. But Manny Pacquiao makes 18,000 times the per capita GDP of the Philippines and two other athletes’ salaries are even higher multiples.  Samuel Dalembert of the Sacramento Kings hails from Haiti; he makes more than 19,000 times Haiti’s per capita GDP. And the salary of Emmanuel Adebayor, who plays soccer for Manchester United, is a staggering 24,000-plus times more than the per capita GDP of his homeland of Togo.

The twenty-five athletes with the highest ratio of salary to GDP are overwhelmingly soccer players from African and Latin American countries. But the $17.5 million salary that China’s Yao Ming earns is 4600 times more than the per capita GDP of his home country; Peja Stojakovic, who plays for the Dallas Mavericks, earns 2700 times what the average Serbian does. On the low end of the scale, there’s the track star Michael Junior Jackson, whose $5000 per season is enough to make him his country’s highest-paid athlete, but is still $800 less than an average worker from the Pacific island nation of Niue makes.

The ratio of CEO pay to that of the average worker has become a common benchmark for massive rises in economic inequality.  According the just-released 2011 edition of Executive Paywatch, the CEOs of S&P 500 companies took home an average of $11.4 million in 2010, up 23 percent from the previous year, and roughly 250 times America’s per capita GDP.  According to The New York Times Economix blog, this amounts to “28 times the pay of President Obama, 213 times the median pay of police officers, 225 times teacher pay, 252 times firefighter pay, and 753 times the pay of the minimum-wage worker.” They are enormous gaps to be sure, but they’re a far cry from the difference between A-Rod’s and the average American’s salary and not even in the same universe as the light year-sized differences between the salaries of superstar athletes and the average citizens of their developing nations.

These are terrific athletes for sure, but do their talents justify such incredible rewards? I love sports, but do they add anything substantial to economic prosperity? What kind of signal does such a highly skewed reward system send about the kinds of talents and skills that really matter for economic growth?

More than 15 years ago, the economist Robert H. Frank famously critiqued America’s emerging Winner Take All Society, in which the super-successful take a bigger and bigger share of the riches, leaving the rest of us to fight over scraps. Things have only gotten worse in the intervening years; the economic crisis has done little, if anything, to abate this runaway trend.

Outlandish sports stars’ salaries illuminate the grotesqueries of  the current age of super-star capitalism, and of our increasingly inequitable, irrational, and unconscionably unequal global economy.

4 Responses to “Show Me the Money: The Geography of Superstar Sports Millionaires”

  1. Ben Says:

    “And the salary of Emmanuel Adebayor, who plays soccer for Manchester United,” Adebayor never played in Manchester United. He currently the player of Manchester City but he gets loaned to Real Madrid at the winter.

    The article is very good and interesting ;)

  2. Christian Resebo Says:

    I first encountered this type of argument studying philosophy at the university (Robert Nozick defended their high pay). A lot can be said about income disparity and the justification of that, of course. But in the above example I think it is needed to acknowledge the fact that super stars of sports significantly although indirectly contribute to consumerism and thereby provide growth to nations and companies (albeit not to the extent they are paid, I suppose). The other thing is that the time in which they are paid these astronomical sums is quite short (in a working life time perspective at least). Otherwise I definately think income and wealth disparity is a problem globally, but the many ways that would lead to greater equality (restricting agreements, progressive taxes, etc) are difficult to construct and may also bring unwanted effects.

  3. Wil Says:

    I am tired of the socialist zero sum arguments that seek to restrict income. Why not get everyone a bigger slice of the pie by making the pie bigger? Two facts in closing,

    1) Americans , generally speaking, don’t care about soccer, rugby or any of those sports that are popular in other countries.

    2) Some people will always earn (or be paid) more than others, for whatever reasons, it has no impact of the lives of most other people.

  4. advertise for cheap Says:

    Pretty element of content. I simply stumbled upon your website and in accession capital to assert that I get in fact enjoyed account your blog posts. Any way I will be subscribing in your feeds and even I achievement you get entry to persistently rapidly.