<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Creative Class &#187; hipsters</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.creativeclass.com/_v3/creative_class/tag/hipsters/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.creativeclass.com/_v3/creative_class</link>
	<description>The source on how we live, work and play</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2011 19:54:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Happy (and not so happy) Places</title>
		<link>http://www.creativeclass.com/_v3/creative_class/2009/11/10/happy-and-not-so-happy-places/</link>
		<comments>http://www.creativeclass.com/_v3/creative_class/2009/11/10/happy-and-not-so-happy-places/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 14:00:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Florida</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lifestyle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congressional Districts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gallup-Healthways Well-Being Index]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[happiest nations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[happiest states]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hipsters]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.creativeclass.com/_v3/creative_class/?p=13339</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
There&#8217;s no shortage of lists of the world&#8217;s happiest nations or of the happiest of the 50 U.S. states. The folks at the Gallup-Healthways Well-Being Index have also compiled detailed happiness scores for America&#8217;s 435 Congressional Districts (see the map below).

The table below shows the 10 highest-scoring and the 10 lowest-scoring congressional districts on the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignnone size-thumbnail wp-image-13365" title="BuddhaHappy" src="http://www.creativeclass.com/_v3/creative_class/_wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/BuddhaHappy-150x150.jpg" alt="BuddhaHappy" width="150" height="150" /></p>
<p>There&#8217;s no shortage of lists of the world&#8217;s happiest nations or of the happiest of the 50 U.S. states. The folks at the <a href="http://www.ahiphiwire.org/WellBeing/Display.aspx?doc_code=RWBCDRank">Gallup-Healthways Well-Being Index</a> have also compiled detailed happiness scores for America&#8217;s 435 Congressional Districts (see the map below).</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-13353" src="http://www.creativeclass.com/_v3/creative_class/_wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/WellBeingDistricts.bmp" alt="WellBeingDistricts" width="598" height="541" /></p>
<p>The table below shows the 10 highest-scoring and the 10 lowest-scoring congressional districts on the Well-Being Index. The table speaks for itself. The happiest districts are among the most affluent in the nation. Six of the top 10 are affluent and physically magnificent California communities. The least happy districts are mainly places of extreme disadvantage, inner-city neighborhoods in Detroit, Cleveland, South Philly, the Bronx, or Appalachia. There are a couple of slight anomalies &#8211; wealthy Grosse Point, Michigan, is lumped together with poor inner-city Detroit neighborhoods (wonder why that would be?), and given the devastation of greater Detroit it&#8217;s not surprising that even the rich would be less happy then elsewhere. And hipster Williamsburg is lumped together with Bed-Stuy: But, then again, whoever said hipsters were happy&#8230;</p>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-13371" title="happy1" src="http://www.creativeclass.com/_v3/creative_class/_wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/happy1.bmp" alt="happy1" /></p>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-13372" title="happy2" src="http://www.creativeclass.com/_v3/creative_class/_wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/happy2.bmp" alt="happy2" /></p>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.creativeclass.com/_v3/creative_class/2009/11/10/happy-and-not-so-happy-places/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More Hipsters</title>
		<link>http://www.creativeclass.com/_v3/creative_class/2009/05/22/more-hipsters/</link>
		<comments>http://www.creativeclass.com/_v3/creative_class/2009/05/22/more-hipsters/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 01:27:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Florida</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lifestyle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Atlantic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blipsters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carl Wilson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hipsters]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.creativeclass.com/_v3/creative_class/?p=11388</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Chris points to &#8220;blipsters.&#8221; But hipster bashing (blipsters included) is a growing sport. Music critic Carl Wilson provides perspective.
[T]he hipster thing is more an outcropping of the mainstream (American Apparel division) than a functional subculture. But for all its internal conformism it&#8217;s still a mode of flamboyant aesthetic display and that still makes a lot [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.creativeclass.com/_v3/creative_class/_wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/fashion_sm.jpg"><img class="show alignnone size-thumbnail wp-image-11390" title="fashion_sm" src="http://www.creativeclass.com/_v3/creative_class/_wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/fashion_sm-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a></p>
<p>Chris points to &#8220;<a href="http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2009/05/black-hipsters.html">blipsters</a>.&#8221; But hipster <a href="http://www.latfh.com/">bashing</a> (blipsters included) is a growing sport. Music critic Carl Wilson provides <a href="http://www.zoilus.com/documents/in-depth/2009/001688.php">perspective</a>.</p>
<blockquote><p>[T]he hipster thing is more an outcropping of the mainstream (American Apparel division) than a functional subculture. But for all its internal conformism it&#8217;s still a mode of flamboyant aesthetic display and that still makes a lot of people uncomfortable and resentful in itself. At its best the hipster is the new Dandy, the semi-subversive who overloads the system by over-subscribing to it (conspicuously consuming) and yet undermines it by seeming as if the real source of their cooperation is that they can&#8217;t take the system seriously enough to bother to oppose it &#8230;</p></blockquote>
<p>There was a time when this kind of self-expression signified something more than fashion. Today, hipsterism has become just one of several archetypal uniforms &#8211; pin-striped banker, polo-wearing preppie, khaki-clad techie, and the like.</p>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.creativeclass.com/_v3/creative_class/2009/05/22/more-hipsters/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

