Posts Tagged ‘University of Michigan’

Richard Florida
by Richard Florida
Sat Aug 22nd 2009 at 12:45pm UTC

City Residents Pay More… Taxes

Saturday, August 22nd, 2009

A new study by University of Michigan economist and MPI associate David Albouy, published in the Journal of Political Economy, finds that workers in expensive cities – including those in the Rustbelt and even hard-hit Detroit – pay a disproportionate share of federal taxes. Overall, urbanites pay 27 percent more in federal income taxes than workers with similar skills in a small city or rural area. Here’s a summary of the study.

“Workers in cities are generally paid higher wages than similarly skilled workers in smaller towns, so they’re taxed at higher rates. That may sound fair, until one considers the higher cost of living in cities, which means those higher wages don’t provide any extra buying power. The federal income tax system doesn’t account for cost of living. So the effect is that workers in expensive cities like New York, Los Angeles and Chicago pay more in taxes even though their real income is essentially the same as workers in smaller, cheaper places.

“The extra burden wouldn’t be so excessive if more federal tax dollars were returned to urban areas in the form of higher federal spending. But according to Albouy’s research, that’s not the case. His data show that more federal dollars are actually spent in rural areas, despite the fact that cities send far more cash to Washington. The net effect of all this is a transfer of $269 million from workers in high-cost areas to workers in lower cost rural areas in 2008 alone.

“Over the long haul, Albouy says, the larger tax burden causes workers to flee large urban centers in the Northeast and settle in less expensive places in the South. So to some extent, it may have been the federal tax system that put the rust on the rust belt.

“Detroit is a perfect example of a city that gets the short end of the stick.

“With its high wage levels, Detroit was, until recently, contributing far more in federal revenues per capita than most other places for over one hundred years,” Albouy said. The recent federal bailout to Detroit automakers “is peanuts relative to the extra billions the city has poured into Washington over the 20th Century.”

“Albouy says that city folk shouldn’t expect relief from this system anytime soon.

“Highly taxed areas tend to be in large cities inside of populous states, which have low Congressional representation per capita, making the prospect of reform daunting,” he writes.

The full study is here (PDF).

Richard Florida
by Richard Florida
Fri Mar 6th 2009 at 9:26am UTC

Geography of Fast Food… and Health

Friday, March 6th, 2009

A University of Michigan study find that neighborhoods with more fast food restaurants have higher rates of stroke. Taking into account demographic and socioeconomic factors, the study found that:

  • Residents of neighborhoods with the highest number of fast-food restaurants had a 13 percent higher relative risk of suffering ischemic strokes than those living in areas with the lowest numbers of restaurants.
  • The relative risk of stroke increased 1 percent for each fast-food restaurant in a neighborhood.
Richard Florida
by Richard Florida
Mon Jun 2nd 2008 at 12:35pm UTC

Cities and Taxes

Monday, June 2nd, 2008

A new NBER working paper by David Albouy of the University of Michigan takes up “The Unequal Geographic Burden of Federal Taxation” (pointer via Ryan Avent). A look at Albouy’s web-page shows he is doing interesting stuff.

In the United States, workers in cities offering above-average nominal
wages — cities with high productivity, low quality-of-life, or
inefficient housing sectors — pay 30 percent more in federal taxes
than otherwise identical workers in cities offering below-average
wages. According to simulation results, federal taxes lower long-run
employment levels in high-wage areas by 15 percent and land and housing
prices by 25 and 4 percent, leading to locational inefficiencies
costing 0.28 percent of income, or $34 billion in 2005. Indexing taxes
to local wage-levels eliminates these locational inefficiencies. Tax
deductions index taxes partially to local cost-of-living and improve
locational efficiency.

Your thoughts?