<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Technology, the Workplace, and Obama&#8217;s Example</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.creativeclass.com/creative_class/2008/11/10/technology-the-workplace-and-obamas-example/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.creativeclass.com/creative_class/2008/11/10/technology-the-workplace-and-obamas-example/</link>
	<description>The source on how we live, work and play</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 09:36:44 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bruno</title>
		<link>http://www.creativeclass.com/creative_class/2008/11/10/technology-the-workplace-and-obamas-example/comment-page-1/#comment-7886</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruno</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 13:57:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.creativeclass.com/creative_class/?p=4856#comment-7886</guid>
		<description>Wendy,
I&#039;d felt you just read my mind. I think its only a matter of time for companies to adopt 2.0 and the facebook model to their own intranets. The question I have is:
This &#039;2.0 intranet&#039; will be at Internet, like a new domain in facebook offering their benefits to enterprises for making their intranets on it? Or it will be a local web package?
If the question its de second, then we must start developing!

regards,
Bruno</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wendy,<br />
I&#8217;d felt you just read my mind. I think its only a matter of time for companies to adopt 2.0 and the facebook model to their own intranets. The question I have is:<br />
This &#8216;2.0 intranet&#8217; will be at Internet, like a new domain in facebook offering their benefits to enterprises for making their intranets on it? Or it will be a local web package?<br />
If the question its de second, then we must start developing!</p>
<p>regards,<br />
Bruno</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wendy Waters</title>
		<link>http://www.creativeclass.com/creative_class/2008/11/10/technology-the-workplace-and-obamas-example/comment-page-1/#comment-7529</link>
		<dc:creator>Wendy Waters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 05:14:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.creativeclass.com/creative_class/?p=4856#comment-7529</guid>
		<description>Thanks Daniel - It sounds great.  I&#039;ll try to make time to listen before they take it down.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Daniel &#8211; It sounds great.  I&#8217;ll try to make time to listen before they take it down.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Carins</title>
		<link>http://www.creativeclass.com/creative_class/2008/11/10/technology-the-workplace-and-obamas-example/comment-page-1/#comment-7452</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Carins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 10:54:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.creativeclass.com/creative_class/?p=4856#comment-7452</guid>
		<description>Wendy,

There was a great debate on the radio here in the UK last night.  It was about experience its impacts on innovation.  There were lots of points raised about diversity, creativity, technology and the workplace.  I&#039;m sure you&#039;d be interested.  It&#039;s in two halves - the first is a discussion amongst a panel of four, the second half the audience is invited to ask questions.  The first half is far more informative...

You can listen to it again for up to seven days:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b00fd40l

Just click on &quot;listen&quot; when the page opens up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wendy,</p>
<p>There was a great debate on the radio here in the UK last night.  It was about experience its impacts on innovation.  There were lots of points raised about diversity, creativity, technology and the workplace.  I&#8217;m sure you&#8217;d be interested.  It&#8217;s in two halves &#8211; the first is a discussion amongst a panel of four, the second half the audience is invited to ask questions.  The first half is far more informative&#8230;</p>
<p>You can listen to it again for up to seven days:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b00fd40l" rel="nofollow">http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b00fd40l</a></p>
<p>Just click on &#8220;listen&#8221; when the page opens up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Wells</title>
		<link>http://www.creativeclass.com/creative_class/2008/11/10/technology-the-workplace-and-obamas-example/comment-page-1/#comment-7401</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Wells</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 03:03:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.creativeclass.com/creative_class/?p=4856#comment-7401</guid>
		<description>Another thing that made Obama successful was they didn&#039;t just go after the facebook generation. I hate to be called at home and don&#039;t want lots of extra e-mail, so I gave through the mail and crossed out my phone number on checks. My daughter gave on-line.

The campaign never called me, responded to me by USPO mail. My daughter got e-mails. They met people wherever they were, segmented the market a hundred ways, gave us each what we wanted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another thing that made Obama successful was they didn&#8217;t just go after the facebook generation. I hate to be called at home and don&#8217;t want lots of extra e-mail, so I gave through the mail and crossed out my phone number on checks. My daughter gave on-line.</p>
<p>The campaign never called me, responded to me by USPO mail. My daughter got e-mails. They met people wherever they were, segmented the market a hundred ways, gave us each what we wanted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wendy</title>
		<link>http://www.creativeclass.com/creative_class/2008/11/10/technology-the-workplace-and-obamas-example/comment-page-1/#comment-7395</link>
		<dc:creator>Wendy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 22:37:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.creativeclass.com/creative_class/?p=4856#comment-7395</guid>
		<description>Great comments.  I&#039;d forgotten about Dean and meetup.com, that did work, sort of.  But, there is one key difference: Obama is President Elect, Dean failed in his bid for the democratic nomination.  

I should have phrased it as Obama &quot;successfully&quot; harnessed the new social networking technologies. Everyone is correct to point out the continuity thread and lessons learned, however.  

David&#039;s comments: contributing to an internal social network versus one&#039;s full external networks.  That will be the tough call for companies - you&#039;re absolutely right.  

I think the &quot;leader&quot; corporations will let employees figure out how to do both, and use both internal and external networks.  An internal intranet may be valuable for finding certain internal documents etc. without the &quot;noise&quot; of the internet and google searches pulling up other stuff.  

Letting go of control will be the key.  Maybe supporting employees to build their own extrnal professional-social networks will yield more long-term dividends than not allowing it.  One such benefit might be retention rates; another could be productivity and problem solving.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great comments.  I&#8217;d forgotten about Dean and meetup.com, that did work, sort of.  But, there is one key difference: Obama is President Elect, Dean failed in his bid for the democratic nomination.  </p>
<p>I should have phrased it as Obama &#8220;successfully&#8221; harnessed the new social networking technologies. Everyone is correct to point out the continuity thread and lessons learned, however.  </p>
<p>David&#8217;s comments: contributing to an internal social network versus one&#8217;s full external networks.  That will be the tough call for companies &#8211; you&#8217;re absolutely right.  </p>
<p>I think the &#8220;leader&#8221; corporations will let employees figure out how to do both, and use both internal and external networks.  An internal intranet may be valuable for finding certain internal documents etc. without the &#8220;noise&#8221; of the internet and google searches pulling up other stuff.  </p>
<p>Letting go of control will be the key.  Maybe supporting employees to build their own extrnal professional-social networks will yield more long-term dividends than not allowing it.  One such benefit might be retention rates; another could be productivity and problem solving.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David J. Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.creativeclass.com/creative_class/2008/11/10/technology-the-workplace-and-obamas-example/comment-page-1/#comment-7393</link>
		<dc:creator>David J. Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 21:29:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.creativeclass.com/creative_class/?p=4856#comment-7393</guid>
		<description>UPDATE: HOWARD DEAN ANNOUNCES PLAN TO STEP DOWN AS CHAIRMAN....
http://www.usatoday.com/news/politics/election2008/2008-11-10-dean-DNC_N.htm

He was instrumental, as discussed above, in the Obama campaign and should be given much credit. Wonder what he is going to do next? Yeee Haaa!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>UPDATE: HOWARD DEAN ANNOUNCES PLAN TO STEP DOWN AS CHAIRMAN&#8230;.<br />
<a href="http://www.usatoday.com/news/politics/election2008/2008-11-10-dean-DNC_N.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.usatoday.com/news/politics/election2008/2008-11-10-dean-DNC_N.htm</a></p>
<p>He was instrumental, as discussed above, in the Obama campaign and should be given much credit. Wonder what he is going to do next? Yeee Haaa!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.creativeclass.com/creative_class/2008/11/10/technology-the-workplace-and-obamas-example/comment-page-1/#comment-7390</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 19:21:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.creativeclass.com/creative_class/?p=4856#comment-7390</guid>
		<description>Support your speculation that Obama was the first to harness youth and technology. How about Dean in 2004 and McCain in 2000? Obama was far from the first to harness technology, youth, grassroots efforts, etc.  

One of the best last-20th century political machines must include the rise of the Republican Party in 1994 with Gingrich and the subsequent &quot;taking&quot; of the White House in 2000 and 2004. Eventually, the Republicans controlled all three branches of the government. Agree or disagree with ideals of the Republican Party, it was a substantial effort that worked in their favor. Of course it got all f***ed up with W.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Support your speculation that Obama was the first to harness youth and technology. How about Dean in 2004 and McCain in 2000? Obama was far from the first to harness technology, youth, grassroots efforts, etc.  </p>
<p>One of the best last-20th century political machines must include the rise of the Republican Party in 1994 with Gingrich and the subsequent &#8220;taking&#8221; of the White House in 2000 and 2004. Eventually, the Republicans controlled all three branches of the government. Agree or disagree with ideals of the Republican Party, it was a substantial effort that worked in their favor. Of course it got all f***ed up with W.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth M</title>
		<link>http://www.creativeclass.com/creative_class/2008/11/10/technology-the-workplace-and-obamas-example/comment-page-1/#comment-7385</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 16:12:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.creativeclass.com/creative_class/?p=4856#comment-7385</guid>
		<description>A bit of a digression, but I&#039;m looking forward to seeing how the Obama administration manages its dissemination of political news. Rather than being at the mercy of the media and reporters&#039; interpretations, communication will come from the administration directly as they capitalize on Obama&#039;s ability to be the first wired president, trumping mainstream media. Sounds refreshing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A bit of a digression, but I&#8217;m looking forward to seeing how the Obama administration manages its dissemination of political news. Rather than being at the mercy of the media and reporters&#8217; interpretations, communication will come from the administration directly as they capitalize on Obama&#8217;s ability to be the first wired president, trumping mainstream media. Sounds refreshing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David J. Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.creativeclass.com/creative_class/2008/11/10/technology-the-workplace-and-obamas-example/comment-page-1/#comment-7381</link>
		<dc:creator>David J. Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 14:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.creativeclass.com/creative_class/?p=4856#comment-7381</guid>
		<description>I guess the real question to me is, will larger companies leave it to individuals to use their personal social networks (via facebook, linkedin, alumni sites, etc) to solve company problems. ie, perhaps an employee is more open when they know they are representing their identity as a whole, not just David M. of XYZ Corporation? I see folks use linkedin and facebook quite frequently regarding their firms. 

This is the real tension, how much of myself as an employee am I going to give to XYZ Corporation. If you ask me to join internal networks then the network is not likely to get 100% of me. The actual percentage the XZY network gets will probably depends on age, amount of time with XYZ, and most importantly, my expectations about my future at XYZ.

I think in the end, corporations are going to have to trust their employees to use their social networks (internet rolodexes)... Now hopefully, they can get as many employees as possible on those larger networks (perhaps through employee groups on sites such Facebook, etc.)...

BTW, Howard Dean and his run in the 2004 primary should be getting more credit for Obama&#039;s victory. They ran hard and out to an early lead using online donations and social networking sites -- most notably meetup.com... I think he is still Chairman of the DNC.... lets give credit where it is due. he was nowhere near the &#039;vehicle&#039; that Obama is, but he did the beta run and there is no doubt that Obama and his team learned from it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess the real question to me is, will larger companies leave it to individuals to use their personal social networks (via facebook, linkedin, alumni sites, etc) to solve company problems. ie, perhaps an employee is more open when they know they are representing their identity as a whole, not just David M. of XYZ Corporation? I see folks use linkedin and facebook quite frequently regarding their firms. </p>
<p>This is the real tension, how much of myself as an employee am I going to give to XYZ Corporation. If you ask me to join internal networks then the network is not likely to get 100% of me. The actual percentage the XZY network gets will probably depends on age, amount of time with XYZ, and most importantly, my expectations about my future at XYZ.</p>
<p>I think in the end, corporations are going to have to trust their employees to use their social networks (internet rolodexes)&#8230; Now hopefully, they can get as many employees as possible on those larger networks (perhaps through employee groups on sites such Facebook, etc.)&#8230;</p>
<p>BTW, Howard Dean and his run in the 2004 primary should be getting more credit for Obama&#8217;s victory. They ran hard and out to an early lead using online donations and social networking sites &#8212; most notably meetup.com&#8230; I think he is still Chairman of the DNC&#8230;. lets give credit where it is due. he was nowhere near the &#8216;vehicle&#8217; that Obama is, but he did the beta run and there is no doubt that Obama and his team learned from it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
