Richard Florida
by Richard Florida
Thu Jan 8th 2009 at 10:28am EST

2009 - Not So Great…

Vespa. The new S. Born to be square.

Here’s a quick run down of some 2009 economic forecasts. I am sort of amazed at how gloomy they are.

Paul Krugman on the second Great Depression:

The fact is that recent economic numbers have been terrifying, not just in the United States but around the world. Manufacturing, in particular, is plunging everywhere. Banks aren’t lending; businesses and consumers aren’t spending. Let’s not mince words: This looks an awful lot like the beginning of a second Great Depression. …

Tim Duy titles his recent Fed Watch, “Starting on an Ugly Note”:

The only certainty for the New Year is that policymakers will continue to pull out all the stops to keep a floor under the US economy. And recent data highlights the difficulty they will face. Hope is high that the incoming Obama Administration can provide the stimulus necessary to generate economic growth by the second half of 2009. The numbers being floated look sufficient to do the job. But will the package provide little more than short term relief or a lasting fix?

Willem Buiter at the Financial Times:

The past eight years of imperial overstretch, hubris and domestic and international abuse of power on the part of the Bush administration has left the US materially weakened financially, economically, politically and morally. Even the most hard-nosed, Guantanamo-bay-indifferent potential foreign investor in the US must recognise that its financial system has collapsed. Key wholesale markets are frozen; the internationally active part of its financial system has either been nationalised or underwritten and guaranteed by the Federal government in other ways. Most market-mediated financial intermediation has ground to a halt, and the Fed is desperately trying to replace private markets and financial institutions to intermediate between households and non-financial operations … The legal framework for the regulation of financial markets and institutions is a complete shambles. Even given the dismal state of the legal framework, the actual performance of key regulators like the Fed and the SEC has been appalling, with astonishing examples of incompetence and regulatory capture.

There is no chance that a nation as reputationally scarred and maimed as the US is today could extract any true “alpha” from foreign investors for the next 25 years or so. So the US will have to start to pay a normal market price for the net resources it borrows from abroad. It will therefore have to start to generate primary surpluses, on average, for the indefinite future…

There will, before long (my best guess is between two and five years from now) be a global dumping of US dollar assets, including US government assets. Old habits die hard. The US dollar and US Treasury bills and bonds are still viewed as a safe haven by many. But learning takes place. The notion that the US Federal government will be able to generate the primary surpluses required to service its debt without selling much of it to the Fed on a permanent basis, or that the nation as a whole will be able to generate the primary surpluses to service the negative net foreign investment position without the benefit of “dark matter” or “American alpha” is not credible.

And, Jim Kuntsler:

We’ll turn around early in 2009 and discover that we are a much poorer nation than we thought because from now on credit will be extremely hard to get for anyone for anything. The businesses that survive will have to keep going on the basis of accounts receivable. This is the area where the crash of giants will be heard. I’ve been saying since publication of The long Emergency that comprehensive downscaling in all our activities, from farming to business to schooling to governance, will be the categorical imperative of the years ahead. Giant enterprises requiring giant loans to get from quarter to quarter will tend to not make it. Borrowing from the future will become a practical impossibility as past bad debts from previous borrowings continue to unwind, cease performing, and get written off. This argument implies that the federal government will tend to flounder just as General Motors, Citicorp, Target Stores and other gigantic enterprises will tend to flounder. It would be sad to see a President Obama so hamstrung and helpless, and it is largely why I see his role as largely symbolic — as a reassuring presence encouraging the distressed public to bravely bear their hardships, and to be kind and helpful among their neighbors.

Households, like businesses, will have to pay as they go from earned income. The house as ATM is over. Credit cards are maxed out and credit ceilings are lowering like the ceiling in “The Pit and the Pendulum,” preparing to slice-and-dice the old “normal” of family life in America. Bankruptcy will be the new Nascar. A lot of families will lose everything. They will sift and disperse into the housing owned by other family members — parents, siblings — and a strange new not-altogether comfortable kind of togetherness will become common. Over time, a lot of people will go looking for casual work “under-the-table”( and probably low-paying). To some degree, these workers will begin to look and act like a new servant class, and before too long they may be absorbed into the households of people who employ them. There will be plenty of room for them there.

Counties, municipalities, and states will join in the bankruptcy fiesta. It would be reasonable to expect collapsing services as a result. This would be a situation fraught with danger — of rising crime, of public health emergencies as water systems are not kept up and sewage treatment becomes unaffordable. I don’t imagine the federal government stepping into every Podunk or Metropolis from sea to shining sea and propping up these services. People will have to cope with danger and deprivation.

While part of me is drawn to the “going-to-hell-in-a-handboat” perspective, I am also amazed at how the economy is holding up in light of 2008’s multiple body blows. Have we managed the worst and been able to turn the corner, or is this just the beginning of the Great Reset?

4 Responses to “2009 - Not So Great…”

  1. Wendy Says:

    I think it has become fashionable to be depressing — to see the worst possible outcome. If you stop and really compare the current situation to even the 1970s or 1980s challenges of 20% interest rates, high unemployment, stagflation, etc. things are not nearly as bad, — at least not for the average person.

    Yes, credit is hard to come by for many companies and individuals — but in 1982 borrowing cost 20%!

    Yes, things will probably worsen before improving, but this is not the great depression, or anything like it.

  2. hayden fisher Says:

    I’m uncertain how of much this is a cycle as opposed to the beginning of a new era so dramatic that even those of us who believe we’re entering a new era will be startled by the degree and pace of change. There will be lots of losers and scores of winners too. The question is: will the public become a winner as government scrounges through the rubble with the rest of the vultures or will only the truly wealthy possess the liquidity to buy distressed assets and carry them forward until they can be resold for considerable profit (even the Great Depression only lasted a decade or more, eventually, things will come back).

    I would bet on the end of the mega-corporation as an independent functioning entity. I would also bet that entrepreneurship will skyrocket. People will simply have no choice but to take whatever skills and ideas they have and try to setup their own lemonade stands to survive. We should embrace this as an opportunity to grow the new household name companies of the next century. We will be surprised by the goods and services they offer.

    At the end of the day, people must survive and create new products and services in order to contribute to society and therefore derive an income or basis for survival.

    One other prediction in the short-term: bartering will come back in vogue, especially with the credit system having taken such a battering. If government does not intervene to free up credit markets, it risks the development of a whole new black market for services and goods brokered by back-room loan sharks and connectors, none of which will pay taxes.

  3. Buzzcut Says:

    Wendy is right. Even under the worst case scenarios of GDP decline, we move back to levels of only a few years ago.

    If we’re as rich as we were in 2005, is that so bad?

    I also think that the seeds of recovery are already baked into the cake. Commodity prices are the lowest they’ve ever been on an inflation adjusted basis. I just picked up an insane mortgage rate, well under 5%. Bernake is looking for a bigger helicopter to dump money from.

    There is a lot of money sloshing in the system right now. Obama threatens to add more money to the system. We are not headed for a depression.

  4. Wil Says:

    There are lots of troubling facets to the recession… Gas is beginning to rise in cost again, if gas prices get high while people are losing jobs, and businesses close, there could be trouble…. The days of easy credit are apparently over. The continuous growth is what has been passing for progress - the endless build out and furnishing of sprawl, must take a different form for it to be sustainable. People need to learn to do things rather than contribute to servicing sprawl. If Obama’s bailout consists of trying to recreate, the success of the past, it will not work.

Leave a Reply