My recent The Atlantic article and multiple covers, including one on my adopted hometown, pose the obvious question: What about Toronto?
Prompting me on this are stories at Torontoist and The Toronto Star. I recently had a nice dialogue on the same with David Olive as he reports, along with nice quotes from Fareed Zakaria who visited recently, in his Star column today:
Looking further ahead, Richard Florida, the urban economics guru, sees Toronto angling for the same global heft as Chicago and Tokyo. “I sense we are in great shape to move up in the global ranks,” says Florida, now based at the University of Toronto’s Rotman School of Management. Florida followed the example of his mentor, the late urbanologist Jane Jacobs, in relocating two years ago to Canada from his native U.S.
Like New York and London, Toronto is a finance, media and entertainment centre, forecast to be among the fastest-growing business sectors over the next generation. Unlike those cities, Toronto also has an abundance of technological research, and more social stability and ethnic diversity. And in recent years the city’s cultural amenities have expanded considerably.
Florida readily concedes that stubborn problems like income inequality and a deteriorating basic-industry sector have yet to be tackled. But in a cover-story essay in the current Atlantic magazine, the venerable U.S. public issues journal, Florida identifies Toronto among fast-growing “mega-regions” most ideally suited to rapid growth. Atlantic gave Florida’s article four covers, showing the skylines of North American cities with the best prospects for sustained prosperity – Toronto, New York, Chicago and San Francisco.
Yet Florida discourages U.S. comparisons. “Stop looking south for models,” says Florida, based for 17 years at Pittsburgh’s Carnegie Mellon University. “They ain’t there. The U.S. is in very deep crisis. It’s time for Toronto to break out and lead.”
The Atlantic piece was concerned with the situation in the States, especially New York, which has been hard hit by the financial crisis.
That said, I’ve been thinking a great deal in my work at the MPI about the opportunity space opened for Toronto, Ontario and Canada as a whole.
Crises are key times for nations and especially for cities and regions. They are the times when changes of position become likely and when nations, and in particular cities and mega-regions, can make their move. My sense is that Canada as a whole and Toronto and its mega-region are as well-positioned as any place in the world to prosper and improve their relative positions in this transformative period.
First off, Canada has a substantial advantage in its stable banking system. Toronto is the center of that system. At the YPO event with Zakaria, Frank McKenna from TD Bank made a joke that went something like this: A couple months ago his bank wasn’t among, say, the top 20 largest banks, now they’re something like fifth or sixth. And then the punch line: In a couple more weeks, even if his bank would likely be, say, third or fourth, through little or no action of its own, RBC is even higher. The World Economic Forum recently ranked Canadian banks the most stable in the world. For these reasons, Toronto is well-positioned to move up in the ranks of global financial centers. No, it won’t topple NY or London, but with banks this big and this stable, it will gain ground. And with employment opportunities eroding in these centers, it can make a big move on top global talent.
Toronto has the opportunity to occupy a relatively unique space among global cities, still beneath the largest global centers, like NY and London, but gaining ground on them, and in a relatively unique and advantaged position as the most vibrant of the so-called “second cities.”
Toronto has a very advantageous economic structure, comparatively speaking. Our MPI team has been collecting, analyzing, and studying data on the industrial and occupational composition of Toronto versus other U.S. and Canadian cities and some other global cities. Led by Kevin Stolarick, our goal is to have matched data on the micro-functionings of the U.S. and Canadian cities and regions, in terms of industries and occupations for every metropolitan level jurisdiction and city across the two countries.
From what we can glean – and expect much more on this to come – Toronto has one of the very fastest metabolizing occupational and industrial metabolic structures of any city with strengths in media, entertainment, design, and creative industries as well as finance. These are the sectors that move at the highest velocity. And it has real technological capability in its orbit with Kitchener-Waterloo and RIM nearby.
Toronto is as diverse, if not more so, then NY, London, or even L.A. Plus, it has an unusually high degree of social cohesion. Add to that great universities that are moving up, great and improving music and arts scenes, and relatively affordable housing, at least by world comparative standards. And you get the picture – a city ready to move up the global ranks.
Yes, Toronto certainly has issues and problems to overcome. Inequality has grown a la David Hulchanski and company’s remarkable “Three Toronto’s” study report. Parts of the region’s older manufacturing economy is suffering and the region as a whole is more geographically segmented and spiky then before.
But the assets are considerable. Leadership “gets it” from the Premier to the Mayor, other political leaders across the region – mayors, legislators, councilors, and economic development officials, university leaders, the non-profit sector, the arts and culture community, labor, environmentalists, and key segments of the business community – all of them are literally moving in the same direction.
You can literally feel the momentum.
There’s only one thing left to do. Stop looking south for models. They ain’t there. The U.S. and its key cities are in deep crisis. Toronto has a golden opportunity to become a model and lead not just for Canada but for North America and the world.
Will we take it?



February 18th, 2009 at 5:13 pm
Interesting, valuable perspectives on Toronto, a city that I’m just starting some “big picture” thinking about right now.
Here’s another question for you – how is the entrepreneurial climate in Toronto? Have you looked at this? Not just in terms of business, but in terms of that overall attitude “hey, what can I accomplish” — social entrepreneurship, etc.? Not sure how one measures it, but there must be a way.
Reason I’m asking: a couple weeks ago I was in Edmonton for a discussion on that city’s economic environment (as well as investment real estate markets). One of the participants was based in Toronto (and spends a lot of time considering the Toronto investment environment). He felt that Edmonton’s leaders had a vision and a plan for civic, community and economic development that just didn’t exist in Toronto. His sense was that Toronto’s leaders wanted to “level down” rather than encourage real business growth and entrepreneurship — and that they were reactionary rather than visionary.
I’ve heard this same comment from others I know in Toronto, although slightly less forceful. Granted they are probably coming from the right-of-centre politically, and didn’t vote for Mayor Miller.
But their perspective raises a question: is Toronto a good place for entrepreneurs? Is there a “cluster” of this activity — or is there this activity within a number of key clusters?
As I think that for Toronto to be a great world city, it needs to be a place where people with great ideas will go to turn those into a success. And, it needs to be a place that will foster existing residents to develop and run with their cool ideas.
February 19th, 2009 at 12:05 am
what is the situation re: permanent work visas in Canada?
February 19th, 2009 at 12:49 am
Richard,
Any reaction from Canadians to the $8 billion for US High Speed Rail in the stimulus package? The map looks like it goes to Vancouver and Montreal, as well as Buffalo right near Toronto (in fact, there’s probably no other reason to go to Buffalo). Do Canadians want to
get easier access to the US market, or are we too close already?
http://www.fra.dot.gov/us/content/203
February 19th, 2009 at 11:08 am
Wendy, as it happens, the MPI has commissioned a working paper to support our “Ontario in the Creative Age” project that examines Social Entrepreneurship in Ontario: http://martinprosperity.org/media/pdfs/Creativity_Social_Benefit_and_Job_Creation-A_Baldwin.pdf
Forthcoming you will also see a paper on Ontario’s Entrepreneurial potential.
February 19th, 2009 at 2:48 pm
Michael, I’m not Richard but I can try to answer your question:
Canada’s federal government would need to take the lead on high-speed rail, and they’ve shown little interest. There was $400 million in the most recent budget for minor service upgrades.
I think most Canadians would support high-speed rail, especially along major corridors like Toronto-Montreal and Calgary-Edmonton, but there wasn’t much buzz here specifically about Obama’s rail plan. As for getting “easier access to the US market”, wasn’t that what NAFTA was all about? The “thickening” of the border is a major concern here, given that US trade accounts for 80% of our exports (30% of the economy overall).
Personally, I’d love to be able to take high-speed rail from Toronto to NYC. It’s a 544 mi (875 km) train route of which about 85 mi (135 km) is in Canada. Right now, it takes 12 1/2 hours, of which two hours is for on-board customs processing. But at the FRA’s target speed of 125 mph, and with customs handled off the train, it’d be a 4 1/2 hour trip, which would be a more viable alternative to flying or driving. And there’s heavy air traffic from Toronto to New York, so there are plenty of potential riders.
February 19th, 2009 at 11:17 pm
City taxes are killing businesses in Toronto. Just drive on Evans – every other building is for lease or sale. Look at Queen st. – more and more are vacant.
February 21st, 2009 at 12:42 pm
Awesome article. To answer your question “Will we take it”?: YES!
February 22nd, 2009 at 12:25 pm
As a globally focused lawyer advising High Net Worth individuals on where they should establish their hedge funds, family offices and themselves, I have for years advised clients to look at places like London, New York, Bermuda, Geneva, Dubai, Hong Kong and Singapore. This despite the fact that while I travel to all these locations frequently (and lived in a few), I ultimately decided to sleep more nights than anywhere in Toronto. However during the recent economic tsunami, I have begun to include my own city into the mix as a number of foreign events combined with real life observations caused me to revise my previous advice.
These events and revelations include: the U.K. decision to change its century old tax rules; the realization that large pools of capital are managed outside of New York and London by “Have Bloomberg will Travel” advisors; the difficulties for families of key employees to resettle to places which are vastly different, expensive, cliquish and far from family and friends; and the increasingly easy air travel from downtown Toronto to major financial centers like New York and Chicago (Thank you Porter Airlines for allowing me to beat my Summit NJ based college roommate to lunch in Mid-Town Manhattan).
Toronto has a number of existing advantages to commend it, including excellent schools/housing/medical facilities and general infrastructure; large pool of educated workers; an ethnically diverse population; EST zone location, and relatively low cost of living compared to other destinations. However, along with some other practical policy improvements (raise your hand Federal Immigration and Finance Ministers!) to increase its attractiveness, what it most suffers from is a concerted co-ordinated effort to sell itself internationally. It is wonderful that Toronto managed to win over such a high profile cheerleader like Richard Florida but we need to back him up with a winning team of professional “closers” who can market and sell Toronto on the world stage.