Archive for the ‘Lifestyle’ Category

Rana Florida
by Rana Florida
Thu Sep 3rd 2009 at 11:32am EDT

Creative Florida

Thursday, September 3rd, 2009

Richard was the keynote speaker alongside Governor Charlie Crist at the 42nd Annual Governor’s Conference on Tourism in Miami Beach last month. Several business, state, and regional officials turned out to discuss the future of Florida. According to Visit Florida, “Tourism is one of Florida’s top industries. In 2007, approximately 84.5 million visitors to Florida generated $65.5 billion in taxable sales, $3.9 billion in state taxes, and employed 991,300 Florida residents.”

What are your thoughts on Florida tourism given the state of the economy?

Governor Charlie Crist

Governor Charlie Crist

Richard Florida Keynote address at the 42nd Annual Governor's Conference on Tourism

Richard Florida Keynote address at the 42nd Annual Governor's Conference on Tourism

State Representative Joe Gibbons

State Representative Joe Gibbons

Richard Florida
by Richard Florida
Wed Aug 26th 2009 at 9:00am EDT

Stressed-Out States

Wednesday, August 26th, 2009

Stress is a fundamental fact of life these days. But which parts of the country have the most stressed-out people?

The map below from the the Gallup-Healthways Well-Being survey shows the stress levels for each of the 50 states. The map reflects the fraction of survey respondents who said they experienced stress “during a lot of the day yesterday” between January and June 2009.

Stress Map.jpg
While people in Kentucky, West Virginia, and Colorado are more stressed out than their counterparts in Hawaii, North Dakota, and Iowa, what strikes me most is how many Americans across-the-board report substantial levels of stress – from a low of 31.4 percent in Hawaii to a high of 44.9 percent in Kentucky. In half of all states, four in 10 residents or more report experiencing stress “during a lot of the day.”
Richard Florida
by Richard Florida
Sat Aug 15th 2009 at 9:30am EDT

This is Your State’s Personality on Drugs

Saturday, August 15th, 2009

Yesterday, we looked at the relationship between drug use and the concentrations of certain kinds of jobs in states. We saw that cocaine is more likely to be used in states where lawyers make up a larger share of the workforce, while marijuana use is associated with states with higher concentrations of artists, scientists, architects, and educators.

Today, we turn to the relationships between drug use and personality. Psychologists define personality according to the five types – extraversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness, neuroticism, and openness-to-experience. A study by psychologists Jason Rentfrow, Sam Gosling, and Jeff Potter has developed and analyzed data on the state-wide concentration of these five major personality types. Charlotta Mellander and I then worked with Rentfrow to examine the relationship between drug use and the state-wide concentration of personality types. The charts below graph the results.

Basically, drug use was positively and significantly associated with one personality type – openness-to-experience (.33**). It was negatively and significantly associated with three others – agreeableness (-.41**), conscientiousness (-.29*), and extraversion (.-52**).

Rentfrow explains our results this way.

I find it helpful to think about these regional differences as reflecting different psychosocial climates/scenes, and one question we can ask is what underlies these climates/scenes?

Openness, for example, is associated with curiosity and trying new things, so it would make sense that Open regions are places where more people have experimented/used drugs than places low in Openness.

Conscientiousness is associated with order, structure, caution, and obedience, so it would make sense that there would be less experimenting with drugs in places where there are large numbers of conscientious people.

Low levels of agreeableness are associated with aggression and antisocial behavior, so it’s conceivable that places with large numbers of disagreeable people will also be places with comparatively high drug use.

The one dimension that is inconsistent with what I would expect is Extraversion. Hans Eysenck proposed that extraversion is driven by arousal. Whereas introverts have higher levels of internal arousal, which motivates them to avoid social contact because it generates more arousal, extraverts are low in internal arousal and seek out stimulating activities to increase their level of arousal (it’s like introverts are anxious and avoid stimulation and extraverts are bored and seek it out). With that in mind, I was expecting to see that stimulants were more commonly used in places where Extraversion is high and that marijuana was used more in places with fewer extraverts. That’s not what we’ve found, though.

Correlation coefficient: .38**

Correlation coefficient: .38**

Correlation coefficient: .40**

Correlation coefficient: -.52**

Correlation coefficient: -.41**

Correlation coefficient: -.29*

Note: * indicates statistical significance at the .05 level; ** indicates significance at the .01 level.

Richard Florida
by Richard Florida
Fri Aug 14th 2009 at 9:30am EDT

This Is Your Occupation on Drugs

Friday, August 14th, 2009

Yesterday, we looked at the relationship between drug use and class. We found that drug use was significantly associated with the percentage of the creative class in a state, and negatively so with the percentage of people employed in the working class.

Today, I dig a bit deeper into the relationship between drug use and specific types of professional, knowledge-based, and creative jobs – management, business and finance, architecture and engineering, science, health-care, education, and arts and entertainment. The patterns here are quite interesting.

Occupations sort relatively neatly along the lines of marijuana versus cocaine use. The short of it is that marijuana use is more positively associated with science (.35), education (.38), artistic professions (.35), and engineering and architecture (.29), while cocaine use is positively associated with lawyers (.41) and, to a lesser extent, with business and finance occupations (.27), computer jobs (.25), and management fields (.26).

Drug use overall is significantly associated with the state-wide concentrations of three major types of occupations – science (.35), architecture and engineering (.34), and arts, design, and entertainment (.33). And, in all three cases, this correlation appears to be driven by marijuana use; none of them are significantly associated with cocaine. Management occupations are also positively associated with overall drug use, though the correlation (.26) is somewhat weaker.

Here’s what my colleague and collaborator, Cambridge University psychologist Jason Rentfrow, had to say about our results:

I think it’s interesting that cocaine is high for finance, law, and quant professions. Although we can’t infer whether it’s people in those jobs actually doing drugs, those professions are generally regarded as intense and lavish. So it’s interesting that an expensive stimulant like cocaine is used more often in places where comparatively large numbers of people work in intense and high-paying jobs… It’s also interesting that marijuana is popular in places with artists, designers, and architects because those are jobs that encourage divergent thinking and marijuana is a psychoactive drug that’s associated with creativity.

What I think is particularly interesting about the results is that most professions possess elements of income, education, and personality. Even in those cases where lawyers and architects make similar amounts of money, they’re very different lines of work and appeal to different types of people.

Correlation coefficient: .41**

Correlation coefficient: .35*

Correlation coefficient: .29*

Correlation coefficient: .32*

Correlation coefficient: .38**

Note: * indicates statistical significance at the .05 level; ** indicates significance at the .01 level.

Richard Florida
by Richard Florida
Thu Aug 13th 2009 at 9:30am EDT

Drug Use and Class

Thursday, August 13th, 2009

Yesterday, we looked at the relationship between drug use and economic patterns. We saw that drug use was associated with both higher levels of state economic output as well as higher levels of unemployment.

Today, I turn to the relationships between drug use and economic class. My colleague Charlotta Mellander charted the relationships between drug use and the percentage of a state’s economy that is made up of two classes: the creative class – that is, people who work in knowledge-based, artistic, and professional occupations; and the working class – those who work in production, transportation, and construction jobs.

While the associations between drug use overall are weak, the patterns for marijuana and cocaine are significant. Take the creative class: Both marijuana and cocaine use are positively and significantly related to states with higher concentrations of the creative class.

Correlation coefficient: 39**

Correlation coefficient: 36**

Now look at the results for the working class, where the pattern is reversed. Both marijuana and cocaine are negatively and significantly related to the concentration of working class jobs in state.

Correlation coefficient: -.35**

Correlation coefficient: -.36**

Note: * indicates statistical significance at the .05 level; ** indicates significance at the .01 level.

Richard Florida
by Richard Florida
Wed Aug 12th 2009 at 9:30am EDT

This is Your Economy on Drugs

Wednesday, August 12th, 2009

Yesterday, I looked at the relationship between drug use and politics. We saw that states that voted for Obama had higher levels of marijuana and cocaine use than those that voted for McCain. But perhaps economic factors lie behind those political trends. We know that Obama drew from less affluent minority voters and also from more well-educated, creative class voters. Perhaps the associations between drug use and voting patterns reflect deeper economic patterns.

The conventional wisdom is that economic hardship is a key factor in drug use. Anyone who watches crime shows like The Wire gets this picture really fast.

To get a first approximation of this, we examined the relationship between drug use and unemployment. Not surprisingly, the use of illegal drugs is correlated with state unemployment (.31). And the correlations are even a bit higher when we look at marijuana (.36) and cocaine use (.36).

Correlation coefficient: 0.31*

But things get more interesting when we look at the relationship between drug use and economic development. While there is no relationship between economic output and illegal drug use overall, there is a significant relationship between state economic output and marijuana, and an even stronger correlation between economic output and cocaine use, as the charts below show.

Correlation coefficient: 0.31*

Correlation coefficient:  0.61**

But there’s more to the story. Tomorrow, I turn to the relationship between drug use and the class structure of state economies.

Note: * indicates statistical significance at the .05 level; ** indicates significance at the .01 level.

Richard Florida
by Richard Florida
Tue Aug 11th 2009 at 1:00pm EDT

This is Your Candidate on Drugs

Tuesday, August 11th, 2009

Ryan Grim’s new book, This is Your Country on Drugs, has revived interest in drug use and drug policy. Around the time it hit the streets, this map of drug use by state (via Map Scroll) started circulating around the Internet.

As it turns out, the map is based on detailed data from the National Survey of Drug Use and Health on the use of various types of “illegal drugs” by state.

So, with this treasure trove of data in hand, and with the help of two colleagues, the Swedish regional economist, Charlotta Mellander, and Cambridge University personality psychologist, Jason Rentfrow, we decided to take a look at the relationship between drug use and various political, economic, and psychological characteristics of states.

There’s lots and lots of research that examines the effects of factors like income, poverty, and race on the propensity to use drugs. But our team has been focusing on the role of psycho-social as well as economic factors on state and regional outcomes. A pioneering study by Rentfrow, Sam Gosling, and Jeff Porter identified the effects of personality factors on state-level economic and social outcomes. So we wanted to extend this line of research to see if and how these various economic, demographic, and personality factors might be related to drug use. We are knee-deep in a more extensive research project, but our preliminary results looked so interesting we thought we would report them and encourage feedback.

Some of the results reinforce the conventional wisdom, but others are surprising – at least for us.

Let’s start with an indicator of politics that’s sure to spark some interest – whether a state voted for Obama or McCain in 2008.

When it comes to the use of illegal drugs overall, there’s no real correlation. But that changes when we look at marijuana and cocaine. Both are significantly and positively related to with Obama states. The converse is true of McCain states, where the correlations are negative. Let me reiterate that these are provisional results which point to general relationships – or should I say associations – which could have many causes.

Conservative commentators might take this as evidence of the anything-goes, libertine lifestyles of “latte liberals” and of the need to return to more traditional, “all-American,” working class values. But that misses the bigger point. There are real differences in the economic and social environments of Obama and McCain states, as John Judis and Ruy Ruy Teixeira’s Emerging Democratic Majority, and Andrew Gelman and his collaborator’s Red State, Blue State, Rich State, Poor State, along with other studies have shown – particularly in their levels of development, economic and occupational structure, and, I would add, in their psycho-social environments as well.

Tomorrow, we’ll start to dig a little deeper into economic correlates of drug use. And, later this week, I’ll look at the relationships between drug use and certain kinds of occupations, and also to the personality types of states.

Correlation coefficient: .42**

Correlation coefficient: -.44**

Correlation coefficient: .37**

Correlation coefficient: -.36**

Note:  * indicates statistical significance at the .05 level; ** indicates significance at the .01 level.

Michael Wells
by Michael Wells
Fri Jul 10th 2009 at 8:29am EDT

Eat Your Vegetables

Friday, July 10th, 2009

In an unexpected turn, the economic slump may lead to healthier eating habits for Americans, especially lower income people. A number of trends are coming together including more people using emergency food banks, the growth of farmers’ markets and community gardens, Alice Waters’ edible schoolyard, the White House garden, etc. One thing I’ve noticed in my grantwriting class at Portland State is a number of students looking for funding to start or expand school, community, or food bank gardens.

Any number of studies say that Americans eat too much meat, fat, sugar, and salt and too few vegetables. This is especially true for poor families who live in neighborhoods without good grocery stores, or don’t have decent kitchens or time to cook, or can’t afford fresh produce. Chronic preventable diseases like diabetes and hypertension, which are epidemic in many poor and minority communities, can be prevented or controlled with diet.

Getting more vegetables into Americans’ diets would have major health benefits and note that most of these aren’t government programs. However, nonprofit Food Banks have for years overused government surplus foods, largely subsidized agricultural products, without regard to their health benefits.

This is from the Oregonian:

“We have a hunger crisis in Oregon. It’s just expanding,” explains Multnomah County Commissioner Jeff Cogen, who’s just set up a vegetable garden on the empty cropland, fertile with irony, of the former county poor farm. “My hope is this is the first of many.”

Up at the Vancouver Vineyard Church food pantry, David and Andrea Walker are looking to their third summer harvest. Clark County is part of the Oregon Food Bank area, and in its first year the operation received an OFB award for excellence in client service.

This year, the Walkers are hoping for 5,000 pounds of produce from the 3,000-square-foot garden out behind the church. It’s not a rolling or pastoral stretch; it’s off to the side of an alley-like casual road, just some cultivated acreage — or more precisely, yardage — in the midst of a weedy lot. At some point in the future, the space could turn into a small apartment court, like so many around it.

The New York Times Magazine had an article last Sunday about Growing Power in Milwaukee.

Like others in the so-called good-food movement, Allen, who is 60, asserts that our industrial food system is depleting soil, poisoning water, gobbling fossil fuels and stuffing us with bad calories. Like others, he advocates eating locally grown food. But to Allen, local doesn’t mean a rolling pasture or even a suburban garden: it means 14 greenhouses crammed onto two acres in a working-class neighborhood on Milwaukee’s northwest side, less than half a mile from the city’s largest public-housing project.

And this is why Allen is so fond of his worms. When you’re producing a quarter of a million dollars’ worth of food in such a small space, soil fertility is everything. Without microbe- and nutrient-rich worm castings (poop, that is), Allen’s Growing Power farm couldn’t provide healthful food to 10,000 urbanites – through his on-farm retail store, in schools and restaurants, at farmers’ markets and in low-cost market baskets delivered to neighborhood pickup points. He couldn’t employ scores of people, some from the nearby housing project; continually train farmers in intensive polyculture; or convert millions of pounds of food waste into a version of black gold.

Another Times story tells of a consultant who works on sustainable food in Oakland, CA:

With its high crime and poverty rates, Oakland doesn’t have nearly the same precious food culture – or produce – that defines nearby Berkeley and San Francisco. But Fernald and Sardo’s home is a modern homestead, preserving the larder for leaner (and busier) times. Every summer they host tomato-canning and jam-making parties; fall is for pumpkin-processing events and butchering pigs with 10 guests invited to make sausage, which Fernald cures in a modified wine fridge in a closet. Splitting a steer with friends? Their chest freezer contains a beefy ode to their vacuum sealer.

Fernald, 34, a former family-farm advocate, was the executive director of last year’s Slow Food Nation event. Now she combines her activism and her acumen with Live Culture, a consultancy that helps companies create sustainable food practices and products. Projects range from developing a line of artisanal cured meats in Shasta and an agritourism in Belize to helping an Alabama barbecue chain source better pork; from working with nonprofits to develop value-added food businesses to organizing the Eat Real Festival, an August fund-raising event that involves 20 taco trucks serving sustainable street food to an estimated 20,000 (plus a butchering contest and home-canned and foraged-food exchange). Fernald is also intent on spreading the urban homesteading bug throughout the Bay Area, having organized the recent Yes, We Can (Food) event, which taught 80 people to make jam.

Here’s a story about the garden on the old Multnomah County poor farm, mentioned above.

On the county’s eastern outskirts where Northeast Halsey Street meets 244th Avenue, prime farmland waited for a new calling. What if the county took even a few of its dozens of vacant acres, Madrigal wondered, and asked the community to work a farm that could help feed hundreds?

The idea not only is part of a local and national trend to return to the earth, but it also brings the county back to its historical roots. The land picked for the farm is part of a sprawling tract that once fulfilled the county’s state-imposed mission to care for its indigent: the Multnomah County Poor Farm.

For practical reasons, she says, gardening makes sense. The county garden will cost about $22,000 to clear, irrigate and plant this year. That could buy a lot of prepackaged food — but not the 20,000 to 40,000 pounds of fresh organic produce that Stone estimates could be grown on the two acres each year.

That produce will go to the Oregon Food Bank and will feed what food resource manager Mike Moran calls a desperate need.

Here’s another farm dedicated to a food bank.

Formed in May of 2000, the Mother Earth Farm is an eight-acre organic farm located in the lush Puyallup Valley. The Farm produces over 150,000 pounds of fresh fruits and vegetables each growing season-all of which is distributed directly to local food banks and hot meal programs. Produce from the Farm is in the hands of food bank clients within eight hours of being harvested. In 2008, the Farm again reached full cultivation of all eight acres producing more than 149,000 pounds of fresh produce, herbs and honey.

Then there are Community Gardens, where neighbors share plots, usually on vacant land or a park. If you Google community gardens you get results for probably all major American cities, and that’s just for starters.

The American Community Gardening Association (ACGA) was founded in 1979 in order to help gardening programs share their limited resources and thereby benefit from each other’s experience and expertise.

ACGA staff, board members, and volunteers answer thousands of requests for information each year about community gardening and greening. They offer support, coach fledgling groups, and promote networking and information sharing on all levels. Through our networking, publications, trainings and annual conference held in a different part of the country each year, ACGA:

  • promotes the formation and expansion of national and regional community gardening networks,
  • develops resources in support of community gardening and greening,
    encourages research on the impact of community greening, and
  • conducts educational training programs to further community gardening and greening.

Another model is school gardens, where students plant and tend the garden, with produce being used in the cafeteria or shared with families. Pioneered by uber- restaurateur Alice Waters in Berkeley, there are now school gardens in hundreds of communities. A quick Google search turned up four networks promoting school gardens: Kids Gardening, City Farmer, Growing Gardens, and School Garden Network.

Then there’s Michelle, who’s in a sort of class by herself in inspiring American gardeners. From a NY Times article on the White House veggie plot:

Twenty-three fifth graders from Bancroft Elementary School in Washington will help her dig up the soil for the 1,100-square-foot plot, in a spot visible to passers-by on E Street. (It is just below the Obama girls’ swing set.)

Students from the school, which has had a garden since 2001, will also help plant, harvest and cook the vegetables, berries and herbs. Virtually the entire Obama family, including the president, will pull weeds, “whether they like it or not,” Mrs. Obama said with a laugh. “Now Grandma, my mom, I don’t know.” Her mother, she said, will probably sit back and say: “Isn’t that lovely. You missed a spot.”

Richard Florida
by Richard Florida
Wed Jul 1st 2009 at 10:30am EDT

It’s All About the Bike

Wednesday, July 1st, 2009
Bikes have replaced cars as the preferred mode of transportation in Amsterdam, according to a new study (reported in the Oregonian via Planetizen):

“The bicycle is the means of transport used most often in Amsterdam,” reports Bike Europe. “Between 2005 and 2007 people in the city used their bikes on average 0.87 times a day, compared to 0.84 for their cars. This is the first time that bicycle use exceeds car use.”

When I started cycling in the Boston area a decade or so, I recall there was a competition between bike, car, and train commuters on designated routes. The bike commuters cleaned up.

It’s getting better in cities from New York to Portland, but American and Canadian cities have a long way to go to catch up – in car too many, commuting by bike remains fraught with risk.

Check out this video of Amsterdam bike commuters:

Richard Florida
by Richard Florida
Mon Jun 15th 2009 at 11:00am EDT

Coffee Bike

Monday, June 15th, 2009
coffee bike.jpg
More photos of “kitchens to go” over at Metropolis. [Original image here.]