
Here’s something interesting…
So Maclean’s did a nice article about a recent study measuring “Learning,” from the Canadian Council of Learning. The name of the article is “Canada’s Smartest Cities.”
But I wondered about the difference or connection between Smarts and Learning, so I did a search of the meaty 45-page report - and found zero (nada, zilch, l’oeuf) instances of the word “Smart.” The authors were plainly sensitive to the issues surrounding labeling something as “smart.”
I’ve wondered about this frequently. Is it elitist to value higher education? By celebrating smartness, are we in essence devaluing those who have not had the opportunities or chosen the path to higher learning?
I confess, I enjoy being around smart people. I find a strong connection between well-educated people and those who are open, tolerant, inquisitive, far seeing, and inclusive. But I’ve also found some of the most maddening people in well-educated professionals - rude, selfish, entitled, unsympathetic, and petty. (They make me want to hang out in a trailer park, or some other low-rent neighborhood where anything goes.)
I still think that the educational attainment of city or community is one of the best measures of a place’s quality of life. Generally, better-educated citizenry make tougher and better decisions for the future, and see value in making a community better for all, not just their peers.