Posts Tagged ‘Nobel Prize in Economics’

Richard Florida
by Richard Florida
Fri Oct 17th 2008 at 9:16am EDT

Krugman on Economic Geography

Friday, October 17th, 2008

The newest Nobelist explains his work on economic geography:

In the world of the old trade theory, “factor mobility” was a substitute for trade: if factories and industrial workers can move freely, they’ll spread out to be close to the farmers, and neither food nor manufactured goods will have to be shipped long distances. But in the economies-of-scale world I had been studying, the “centrifugal” effect of widely dispersed resources, which tends to push economic activity into spreading out, would be opposed by the “centripetal” pull of access to large markets, which tend to promote concentration of economic activity.

Think of Henry Ford and his Model T. He could have established many factories, spread across the country, to be close to his customers. Instead, however, he found that it was worth incurring extra shipping costs to achieve the economies of scale of one big factory in Michigan.

And once you’re concentrating production in a limited number of locations, which locations will you choose? Locations where there’s a large market – which will be locations where lots of other producers have also chosen to concentrate their production. If the centripetal forces are strong enough, you’ll get a cumulative process: regions that for historical reason have a head start as centers of production will attract even more producers, becoming the economic “core” while other areas become the “periphery.” Thus for about a century, until the rise of the Sunbelt, the great bulk of U.S. manufacturing was crammed into a fairly narrow belt from New England to the inner Midwest; today, 60 million people live along a narrow stretch of the East Coast. Those 60 million people aren’t there because of the scenery; each of them is there because the other 60 million people are also there.

The same sort of logic explains why particular industries concentrate in certain locations, except that in such cases the logic involves things like a deep labor market for specialized skills and a good market for suppliers of specialized inputs. What determines which industry locates where? Often, accident: Silicon Valley owes its existence in large part to a couple of guys named Hewlett and Packard, who started some stuff in their garage, New York is New York because of a canal that only pleasure boaters use today.

Zoltan Acs
by Zoltan Acs
Mon Oct 13th 2008 at 3:48pm EDT

Krugman

Monday, October 13th, 2008

This is a great day for geography. Krugman’s Prize is a real vindication that geography is important and that the profession also thinks so. Richard still remembers when we met in Ottowa in 1989, almost 20 years ago, to lay out some of the work on cities. For those of us that have contributued to this version of our work, Richard Florida, Maryann Feldman, David Audretsch, Attila Varga, Sam Youl Lee, Catherine Armington, among others, we are all indebted to Paul for his pathbreaking work in this area. Thank you.

Richard Florida
by Richard Florida
Mon Oct 13th 2008 at 8:27am EDT

Good Day for Economic Geography

Monday, October 13th, 2008

Paul Krugman was awarded the Nobel Prize in economics today. The announcement reads simply: “for his analysis of trade patterns and location of economic activity.” The award is very well-deserved and fantastic for our field. My hunch is Paul Romer can’t be far behind.